Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-19-2015, 01:07 PM   #1 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
12 ways to get better gas milage

12 Ways to Get Better Gas Mileage

1 fill up less often.
2 measure your fuel mileage
3 dont drive aggressively
4 remove excess weight
5 avoid traffic
6 tire pressure
7 tire alignment
8 the A/C vs. window down debate
9 shift at lower engine speed (manual transmissions)
10 drive slow
11 dont try to accelerate up a hill
12 coast
13 use RUG
14 buy a honda

We have multiple topics on everyone of these.
It come no where near rivaling our master wiki list.

The only 2 that catch my attention for thinking out side the box that the news outlets think from inside are tire alignment and just making mention of coasting.
If you have a VW or Audi with a turbo gas motor absolutly do not use RUG unless you really like visiting your dealership and giving them money.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-20-2015, 11:15 AM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Rug?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
mcrews (07-20-2015)
Old 07-20-2015, 04:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 49.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
regular unleaded gas?
Not everybody would agree, especially on a high compression engine higher octane can yield better economy as they tend to ping on regular, forcing the ECU to alter the timing.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
mcrews (07-20-2015)
Old 07-20-2015, 05:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
11. seems wrong. Accelerating up a hill can use the engine more efficiently if one is able to use the energy to coast in a section where the engine is less efficient.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 06:08 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
And why would filling up less often get you better mpg? (Assuming of course that you don't drive out of your way to get gas.) Even filling the tank of my Insight, rather than my usual $20 bill in the cash pump, means I'm hauling around an extra 20-30 lbs.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 06:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
regular unleaded gas?
Not everybody would agree, especially on a high compression engine higher octane can yield better economy as they tend to ping on regular, forcing the ECU to alter the timing.
exactly!
When I had the Infiniti Q45, I tested running regular and high on my trips to texas. The ecu would alter the timing and reduce the mpg.
On newer cars (the Q45 was an 02) run what is recommended. THe ECU KNOWS!
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 09:31 PM   #7 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
And why would filling up less often get you better mpg? (Assuming of course that you don't drive out of your way to get gas.) Even filling the tank of my Insight, rather than my usual $20 bill in the cash pump, means I'm hauling around an extra 20-30 lbs.
The theory is (on paper) that filling up less often means you carry less weight. More than likely you can calculate this difference on paper and its so small wont actually see it.
Then you get into the whole "in tank fuel pump immersion debate" where immersing the fuel pump in fuel (not letting the tank drop much below 3/4) cools the fuel pumps motor allowing it to last a lot longer.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2015, 09:33 PM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,184

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,527 Times in 2,801 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post


exactly!
When I had the Infiniti Q45, I tested running regular and high on my trips to texas. The ecu would alter the timing and reduce the mpg.
On newer cars (the Q45 was an 02) run what is recommended. THe ECU KNOWS!
The VW 1.8L turbo gas mark 4 engine saw at least 2mpg less on RUG then mid grade.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2015, 01:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The theory is (on paper) that filling up less often means you carry less weight.
Oh, different cultures. To me, "fill up" means when the fuel gauge gets close to empty, you put some gas in. Not necessarily (or even that often) to fill the tank completely full. So for me, putting in $20 worth gets me to half or 3/4 full. Though there was one time during the recent price dip when I actually got about a quarter back in change :-)


Quote:
....cools the fuel pumps motor allowing it to last a lot longer.
Fuel pumps wear out? Well, I suppose if you've got a gas guzzler, the poor thing must struggle to move all that gas :-)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2015, 06:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The theory is (on paper) that filling up less often means you carry less weight. More than likely you can calculate this difference on paper and its so small wont actually see it.
Then you get into the whole "in tank fuel pump immersion debate" where immersing the fuel pump in fuel (not letting the tank drop much below 3/4) cools the fuel pumps motor allowing it to last a lot longer.
Right, which is hilarious considering I have driven my EFI Toyota 4x4 truck for 20 years (200k miles) never filling until empty, and it still has the original fuel pump.

__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com