Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-20-2016, 08:19 AM   #41 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 50.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
While you could "get away" with one gear, you need to make compromises that may be undesirable. Either acceleration will be severely hindered, or you need to have a very loose viscous coupling to allow the engine to get up to speed (which reduces efficiency) or you need some other power source to pick up the slack.

Your Viper in 3rd gear would be able to accelerate, but not rapidly until maybe 30-50 mph.

Powerglides (2-speed GM tranny) are often used in drag racing because they are light, can be made to be robust, and only one shift tends to improve consistency. With a loose torque converter, acceleration is still excellent, but you wouldn't want this combo for commuting to work every day.
I agree, the Viper example does bring a lot of required compromises. That 0-100 pull is probably on the flat. You might get away with it in hilly E TN, but pulling away from the uphill stop sign would be accompanied by the delicious smell of deep fried clutch.

The loose torque converter is what really makes the low gear counts work. It makes the tranny behave as a sorta-kinda CVT when pulling at low revs.

Frank's statement that you spend most of your time at speed is a good one, but dang it now I have to confess that it's unrealistic to expect a manufacturer to build one car that is suitable for someone like Frank, happily cruising the midwestern steppes and another car just like it, but with a transmission for someone like me, cruising just a few miles and then cut-and-thrusting through downtown stoplights.

Hang it all, CVTs really are the best option. Or the best of what's currently available. Is anybody building a toroidal unit yet? Besides Nuvinci, that is.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-20-2016, 08:33 AM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,018

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 40.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,871
Thanked 2,515 Times in 1,555 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
Tbh I will always protest that CVT's are vastly superior to traditional auto's. I can accelerate with a light foot at 1700rpm in my civic, at a constant rate, all the way up to 65 when the ratio runs out, and cruise at 1900rpm at 70. Or, I can stomp on it and accelerate at 5500rpm all the way to 70, or mild throttle and accelerate at 2000rpm. They gotta be lighter than a 7-9 speed transmission autos, and are more efficient if memory serves me right.
True on all counts. The only problem is their longevity - most CVTs from the early 2000's die before 200k miles, and a lot of them die before 150k. Their lifespan is less than the autos they replaced, but the improved efficiency is worth it - you save enough fuel, it pays for your transmission, which will eventually need replacement. I can't speak for the CVTs they're making now, because they're not old enough yet for us to know, but with previous cars it gets significantly worse as you increase the amount of torque they need to deal with.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2016, 10:36 AM   #43 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,479

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,218
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
I now understand why my advocacy for my own design which actually offers a "bazillion" ratios, on a molecular basis, falls on deaf ears in this forum...

Kind of sad to realize my personal failure where my efforts fall on deaf ears. A lot of time and energy wasted here.
I don't think it falls on deaf ears so much as I don't have any expertise with hydraulic hybrids, and have seen no examples of one.

I'd get very excited and rave about it if there was a working example, in a real car, with verifiable results.

I love the idea, but manufacturers aren't utilizing the technology, and there has got to be a variety of reasons that makes it a poor solution for the majority of drivers.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (04-20-2016)
Old 04-20-2016, 11:46 AM   #44 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
If you are Koenigsegg, you can build a supercar with one speed... and use electric motors to boost low speed performance:
How The 1,500 HP Koenigsegg Regera Hits 248 MPH Without A Gearbox

However, for a conventional, basic commuter car where efficiency is the primary goal... more IS better (generally)
The setup used in the Koenigsegg Regera actually resembles a little the HSD from the Prius.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 05:54 AM   #45 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
A 'Glide perspective:

CC Drive Report: 1958 Chevrolet Impala – Pink Floyd Was Dressed In Business Casual
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 11:32 AM   #46 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
Tbh I will always protest that CVT's are vastly superior to traditional auto's. I can accelerate with a light foot at 1700rpm in my civic, at a constant rate, all the way up to 65 when the ratio runs out, and cruise at 1900rpm at 70. Or, I can stomp on it and accelerate at 5500rpm all the way to 70, or mild throttle and accelerate at 2000rpm. They gotta be lighter than a 7-9 speed transmission autos, and are more efficient if memory serves me right.
Now that there are manufacturers OTHER than Nissan making CVTs, I think they will get a better reputation!

The early Nissan CVTs were awful ... some of them still are. I don't mean their behavior, I mean their reliability.

I drove a 2015 Civic with CVT, rather liked it. And I do like CVTs in heavy city traffic. I made the mistake of driving in Times Square the Saturday before christmas in 2014. Lot of sitting and going and then sitting and going. The CVT handled it well, if it were a traditional automatic (and not a rental), I would have been worried about the thing wearing itself out by constantly having to shift. Or killing the clutch on a manual.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 01:41 PM   #47 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Actaully the really crappy CVT's were Subaru Justys and Honda's. Not sure who is making them besides Jatco which is a subsidiary (wholly owned) of Nissan. All are based on the Van Dorn belt drive of the 50s. It took belt technology and development to get them reliable. Nissan gave us a 10 year 120k warranty on our Murano, which was rated to tow 3500 pounds.

Modern CVTs are "push belts" with 400+ steel segments that push against each other instead of the traditional pull we think of in belts.


regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
H-Man (04-21-2016), RustyLugNut (04-21-2016)
Old 04-21-2016, 01:43 PM   #48 (permalink)
The brake pedal is evil
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California__ Awsome: Yes
Posts: 390

Denny's Detector - '08 Mercury Grand Marquis

Taserface - '17 Chevy Volt
Thanks: 5
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
Didn't know that.
__________________
Getting sensor data off of a pre OBDII Toyota ECU via TDCL.
All of this is on E10: Project E is my current focus.

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2016, 04:59 PM   #49 (permalink)
Thalmaturge
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,156

The Tinyvan - '07 Honda Fit Sport

Spicy Italian - '13 Fiat 500 Abarth

eBike - '94 Trek Mountain Track 820
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 424 Posts
It looks like it works kind of like the Shimano internal 11 speed hubs. Multiple planetary gearsets in a row.

Neato.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2016, 04:23 AM   #50 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
The setup used in the Koenigsegg Regera actually resembles a little the HSD from the Prius.
Not really, the Regera is a series hybrid that also has a torque converter and clutch for higher efficiency direct drive. HSD can vary the engine speed vs. vehicle speed.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com