Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2013, 12:03 AM   #51 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
.
Quote:
How's it do with the 18-wheeler bow wave and backwash?

Bow waves and backwash do push it around more than before the tail was added. It didn't feel unsafe, it just required paying better attention and a firm grip on the wheel when they were passing.

The big difference is in bow waves between different makes of trucks. Some will push it over a 1ft. or more, while others barely make it wiggle. Which goes to show there is a lot room for aerodynamic improvement by the truck manufactures.

Backwash severity was determined by what trailer they were pulling. Flat beds and tankers seem to have little effect, while boxes obviously had the most (more than average).

The car likes clean air. Mpg is significantly less when I'm their wake according to the computer. So I stay away.


Quote:
slowmover

Well, since we don't know how the fishing turned out
Caught a few small ones...










>


Last edited by redneck; 06-02-2013 at 08:17 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-08-2013), MobilOne (05-30-2015), slowmover (06-03-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-02-2013, 12:02 PM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
.Bow waves and backwash do push it around more than before the tail was added. It didn't feel unsafe, it just required paying better attention and a firm grip on the wheel when they were passing.
My wife owned two Geo Metro's, it was crazy how much the car felt like it was going to be sucked under a tractor trailer when passing.

It felt unsafe then, don't even want to think about it being a tad worse.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2013, 12:29 PM   #53 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck View Post
Bow waves and backwash do push it around more than before the tail was added. It didn't feel unsafe, it just required paying better attention and a firm grip on the wheel when they were passing.

The big difference is in bow waves between different makes of trucks. Some will push it over a 1ft. or more, while others barely make it wiggle. Which goes to show there is a lot room for aerodynamic improvement by the truck manufactures.

You seem to know how to live in the moment... your description of the bow wave is a little like the observation and patience of fishing... great clean project, nice fish too!
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
redneck (06-02-2013)
Old 06-03-2013, 08:38 AM   #54 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Thnaks for the report on highway speed truck wash. I'll stay a bit farther over, as I do with most RV's.

As to the conerns of others I have the same "problem" (something to solve, not something to fear) with my 8,000-lb pickup fitted iwth an ordinary bed topper. The "problem" is exacerbated when my 35' travel trailer is in tow. Enough that I have bought a larger anti-roll bar for the Steer Axle, and will fit one to the Drive Axle. And maybe a panhard rod. These things do not come without their own price, either. No free lunch. The suspension rise with the wind acting on it is significant.. Without question best tire pressure is a must (not maximum) and the steering gear must be without any slop. IF the changes mean I must slow that much more in the rain, so be it. (Etc).

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 10:33 AM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
As to the conerns of others I have the same "problem" (something to solve, not something to fear)
A great attitude to have, will get you though some sticky challenges and make this an engaging hobby.

My own modest aero-treatments have a net zero affect on mpg.

Some things I've done have gained me mpg, others added down-force resulted in better handling at speed, so it's a wash.

In the end I feel much safer and with no loss of mpg.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 11:16 AM   #56 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
A great attitude to have, will get you though some sticky challenges and make this an engaging hobby.

My own modest aero-treatments have a net zero affect on mpg.

Some things I've done have gained me mpg, others added down-force resulted in better handling at speed, so it's a wash.

In the end I feel much safer and with no loss of mpg.

Yes, sir, it limits what I am willing to do as FE is only one concern of many . . for example, how would the vehicle of this thread do when loaded to manufacturer weight maximums (fleeing a hurricane in traffic with the family and what we can carry). We do have fun with this game of fuel burn, but larger perspectives put what can be done and what ought to be done in correct perspective.

IOW, when I leave out the full use of the vehicle (passenger and cargo load) I am playing a game . . when I take them also in to consideration I am playiing that same game at a higher level. (A second vehicle moves us farther away from what economy is, IMO).

None of these comments are intended to be critical as to time & effort. A win, as I see it. I may wish to have an Aerolid on the back of my truck, but I may wind up with a stout/secure contractor topper with a full rear door that would need a boat-tail fitted . . security/load volume is a higher priority as to full use of the trucks abilities. Etc. Trade-offs abound.

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 12:06 PM   #57 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowmover View Post
Yes, sir, it limits what I am willing to do as FE is only one concern of many . . for example, how would the vehicle of this thread do when loaded to manufacturer weight maximums (fleeing a hurricane in traffic with the family and what we can carry).
Being weighed down would definitely affect many things, but the boat tail should enable the driver to make a faster getaway, although would be a liability when the storm gets too close.

I hope that non of us face hurricanes, with or without boat tails.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2013, 02:02 PM   #58 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,520
Thanks: 8,073
Thanked 8,870 Times in 7,322 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i
and the steering gear must be without any slop.
No kidding. The most I ever saw was on a farm truck, out in a field baling hay. 1/4 turn of slop. Imagine even 1/10th of that at freeway speeds.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2013, 12:31 PM   #59 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
No kidding. The most I ever saw was on a farm truck, out in a field baling hay. 1/4 turn of slop. Imagine even 1/10th of that at freeway speeds.
That would be an all-too-typical FORD I-Beam front end. Or nearly any live axle / recirc ball 4WD pickup . . . the difference between those and the IFS + rack & pinion on mine (and some others) is night and day.

Both CUMMINS and KENWORTH recommend getting this minimized as corrections per 100-miles is a quantifiable FE problem (trailer movement is problem enough, IOW).

.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2013, 12:34 PM   #60 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
Being weighed down would definitely affect many things, but the boat tail should enable the driver to make a faster getaway, although would be a liability when the storm gets too close.

I hope that non of us face hurricanes, with or without boat tails.

"High profile vehicles" are sent away from the coast prior to mandatory evacuation. This includes many RVs. But best aero is a help in any situation where the addition of side "sail area" isn't too much of a compromise AFAIK.

.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com