05-10-2018, 01:43 PM
|
#1641 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
I have little issue with the whole global warming agenda other than it places all the blame of said warming on CO2. Severe curtailing of CO2 emissions will not stop global warming as such. Even the experts admit this. So what point is it to cripple our economies without a real plan to replace our energy needs with something more realistic than the effusive renewable energy as it is produced today?
|
Huh? Climate change will cost us more and more - it already costs us BILLIONS. And fossil fuel pollution costs us billions in health and early deaths. Our military spending to protect oil is costing us billions, if not trillions.
We have to stop putting ANY carbon from fossil fuels into the air if we want to have a chance of our society surviving. We have put so much carbon into the air so quickly, that it will take at LEAST 50 years for the warming to stop.
IF we have already triggered enough feedback warming - melting ice caps, melting tundra, increased water vapor, methane and nitrous oxide, warming oceans - then the only way we can keep our society is the put as much of the carbon into the soil as we can.
What part of the fact that renewable energy has provided more NEW jobs than fossil fuels don't you understand? If we avoid runaway warming - then dropping fossil fuels will pay for itself.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-10-2018, 04:10 PM
|
#1642 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,882 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydrive
I highly recommend everyone watch COOL IT, a documentary based on a quasi-biography of Bjorn Lomborg. He is an environmentalist who introduces practical, every-day solutions to the global warming problem...
I also think nuclear energy is a *good* idea.
|
I haven't seen it. While I think the science should be, and needs to be, falsifiable; the danger is in the economic/Hegelian 'solutions'.
Nuclear is high-tech and scales with difficulty, if only politically. The solution is multi-variate, but the low-tech scalable solution is biochar. In this I agree with NeilBlanchard.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
05-10-2018, 04:14 PM
|
#1643 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Nuclear is the only tech that will generate a lot of power 24 hours a day, rain or shine, wind, no wind, even with snow covering everything while making little CO2 over the fuel life cycle.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 04:47 PM
|
#1644 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
I wish people could realize that we can't "drop fossil fuels". We might be able to transfer half of our electric and some personal transportation (until we run out of materials for batteries), but this is less than half of our total energy consumption. Rebuildables are fossil fuel extenders. There is no replacement for liquid fuel in heavy machinery and transportation at the scale we require to keep the economy going.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 05:08 PM
|
#1645 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
This latest lithium shortage and the 2010ish nickel price surge shows that battery powered everything is likey impossible and that battery powering a good portion of the vehicles produced today is not even close to being possible.
That doesn't even begin to tackle grid storage.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 05:16 PM
|
#1646 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,764
Thanks: 4,320
Thanked 4,473 Times in 3,438 Posts
|
What ever happened to H2 being used as a battery? I remember reading stories that said my cell phone would be hydrogen powered one day.
Nuke could decompose water into H2, and in turn could power and heat most things.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 05:20 PM
|
#1647 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
H2 production transportation and storage is very inefficient. "fool cells" are expensive and fragile.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sendler For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 05:23 PM
|
#1648 (permalink)
|
Corporate imperialist
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,266
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
|
Hydrogen is horrible.
As long as natural gas is around no one is going to be making large amounts of hydrogen for portable use. Since the cheapest source of hydrogen is natural gas and the cost of hydrogen is at least $15 per million BTUs. Which triples the price of the natural gas. Just use natural gas.
Also natural gas sourced hydrogen still produces lots of CO2.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
Last edited by oil pan 4; 05-10-2018 at 05:51 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-10-2018, 05:59 PM
|
#1649 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
I am waiting for the hydrogen fuel crash. Would it resemble a mini hydrogen bomb? lol
|
|
|
05-10-2018, 06:01 PM
|
#1650 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
This latest lithium shortage and the 2010ish nickel price surge shows that battery powered everything is likey impossible and that battery powering a good portion of the vehicles produced today is not even close to being possible.
That doesn't even begin to tackle grid storage.
|
Battery parts are recyclable, however. Battery elements are carbon intensive to mine, but they can be used over and over.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hydrive For This Useful Post:
|
|
|