The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

[oil pan 4]

I bet Siberia is really great full for their global warming.

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Why are you relying on local weather to discount global climate change? That would reveal that you are misinformed ...

Why is the pot calling the kettle black?
Plus what part of 27 states is "local weather"?

[redneck]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

My opinion of the guy has nothing to do with it. He is a known liar about the climate.

Since you uncritically take his word for it - you lose credibility, too.

You assume way, way to much.

Is the originator of the article “The Washington Post” lying also?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/energ...=.1b5f7f6fad2d

Scientists behind a major study that claimed the Earth’s oceans are warming faster than previously thought now say their work contained inadvertent errors that made their conclusions seem more certain than they actually are.

Two weeks after the high-profile study was published in the journal Nature, its authors have submitted corrections to the publication. The Scripps Institution of Oceanography, home to several of the researchers involved, also noted the problems in the scientists' work and corrected a news release on its website, which previously had asserted that the study detailed how the Earth’s oceans “have absorbed 60 percent more heat than previously thought.”

“Unfortunately, we made mistakes here,” said Ralph Keeling, a climate scientist at Scripps, who was a co-author of the study.

What was “Unfortunate” for them was that they got caught.

A independent scientist noticed that their calculations didn’t add up.


https://www.nicholaslewis.org/


His paper outlines the errors in the original report.

To which the original authors admitted to.

https://www.nicholaslewis.org/wp-con...906ff-36424229


I guess some people think math don’t be like it is. But it do...



>

[oil pan 4]

Everyone who doesn't believe and go along with the man made global warming narrative is automatically a liar,.

[freebeard]

Originally Posted by aerohead

My browser does not give me a broken red line for heatwave, but says that freebeard should be capitalized.

Lies. All lies. just ask e. e. cummings.

Redneck -- Thank you for you good work.

I just skim things nowadays, but I saw the affect/effect conflation. The Sun causes the climate. Man-made effects modulate it.

I am also unfamiliar with Express.co.uk. The article seemed adequate:
....
While trying to find confirmation for all of that I found this: https://sputniknews.com

Express is respectable, be wary of Daily Mail. Sputnik is like RT, you go off-shore for the real scoop. But we shouldn't blame the technology for the California political class not understanding maintenance and public safety.

We should still count the cost.

[sendler]

"When the Soviet Union was wound up the Russian economy collapsed. Between 1989 and 1998, fuel related emissions fell in that country by 5.2% per annum because economic activity halved. However, this was no model to copy. It was a period of deep crisis. The death rate, particularly among young Russian men, soared."
.
https://www.resilience.org/stories/2...-mainstream-2/
.

[Xist]

Originally Posted by sendler

"The death rate, particularly among young Russian men, soared."

Global warming causes male infertility! No source, do push-ups!

[freebeard]

Alcoholism.

I just found https://www.reddit.com/r/DarkFuturology/, but I've run out the clock here at the library.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by freebeard

I've run out the clock here at the library.

I had an ambitious plan to feed my parent's house with my awesome apt internet connection 7 miles away.

If you happen to live on top of a mountain, I could go way more ambitious and beam it to your undisclosed and uber hidden location. I just need a bearing to point the antenna. Oh, and you'd have to mount/aim the very directional antenna at your location too.

[sendler]

Scale. Growth.
.
Between 1997 and 2017, global electricity output climbed an average 571 terawatt-hours per year. Merely keeping pace with growth in electric demand would require installing 14 times as much photovoltaic capacity as Germany’s entire installed base, and it would have to do so every year.
.
or wind.
.
Thus, just to keep pace with growth in electrical demand, the world would have to install twice as much wind-energy capacity as now exists in all of China, and it would have to do so annually.
.
And that is just growth of electricity consumption. Not to mention replacing all electricity. And then replacing all the remainder of primary energy consumption which is another 4 times electricity.
.
the world’s demand for oil will hit a record 100 million barrels per day. That would be an increase of about 1.8 million barrels per day over 2017 numbers.
.
global solar production totaled the equivalent of about 2 million barrels of oil. Just enough to match the growth in oil consumption if we weren't already comparing solar to the growth in electrical consumption. And oil is only 40% of primary energy.
.
.
https://nypost.com/2018/11/16/the-nu...y-decade-soon/

[redpoint5]

Hey, don't bother me while I'm rearranging the chairs on the Titanic.