The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

[slowmover]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

According to the ipcc, that's still weather.
Their minimum time for "climate" is 30 years. If you read any ipcc report you would know they don't consider a single year climate.
Plus I know they said it's been the warmest years on record the last few years then they revised it down so no warmest years on record since at least 2014 or 2015.

I'm not denying anything. I read the reports and agree with them. But what I'm doing is reading the whole thing and taking it in. You you and litesoff do is like skipping the whole bible, only reading revelations then making up your own crazy dooms day religion based on the craziest nightmare like parts of 2 pretty big books.

They can’t hear you. Are chanting louder & louder. Fingers in ears.

The lie of the hockey-stick graph was enough for the rational fence-sitters.

.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by slowmover

They can’t hear you. Are chanting louder & louder. Fingers in ears.

The lie of the hockey-stick graph was enough for the rational fence-sitters.

.

I didn't say I trust them.

[All Darc]

There is one advantage of USA fat people statistics.
Is USA today feeds 310 million people, and most ate as there is no tomorrow.

In reality, since most people ate much more than they need, it means |USA can feed 500 or 550 million people. Some people even ate 3x more than they need. But taking average of over eating, I supose 500 million it's a probable number.

[sendler]

Hockeysticks. Some go up and then back down.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.
Learn. Think. Talk.
.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysgx...FD7zzhnozJUsBV

.

[slowmover]

Originally Posted by All Darc

There is one advantage of USA fat people statistics.
Is USA today feeds 310 million people, and most ate as there is no tomorrow.

In reality, since most people ate much more than they need, it means |USA can feed 500 or 550 million people. Some people even ate 3x more than they need. But taking average of over eating, I supose 500 million it's a probable number.

Factory food is contaminated, and most of those folks have been poisoned. “Organic” doesn’t exist, and the limitation (as always) is water.

Water — and oil to grow, harvest and move food or its base components — is the focus that yields results.

Two-thirds the population of this country cannot support themselves, is the other.

That’s the collision.

GW is just cover for yet more $$ extraction (theft) AND control. Cover for tyranny. The “terrorists” are the one third who support not only themselves, but all others as well.

Given that GW is the same crowd supports the destruction of the West via invasion, what else would one need to know (its BS)? Ask them to in any way prove their idea of the positive aspects of “diversity”. Ha! Lies from both sides of their mouths.

.

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

According to the ipcc, that's still weather.

The record high temperatures cover a period much longer than 30 years. Climate is the pattern of the weather - and records are how we see the patterns.

Your statements are contradicted by science, and the data. You don't seem to accept science.

[freebeard]

According to the ipcc, that's still weather.
Their minimum time for "climate" is 30 years. If you read any ipcc report you would know they don't consider a single year climate.
...
I'm not denying anything. I read the reports and agree with them. But what I'm doing is reading the whole thing and taking it in. You you and litesoff* do is like skipping the whole bible, only reading revelations then making up your own crazy dooms day religion based on the craziest nightmare like parts of 2 pretty big books.

The IPCC report is finalized in 2022. Until then all we have is their raw data.

*Can I steal that one.

[sendler]

A walk with Jem Bendell.
.
"It's not just about drawing down carbon. We need to ADAPT fairly."
.
"60% of food for the UK is imported."
.
https://youtu.be/3jtKemrEMzA

[litesong]

Originally Posted by redpoint5

Got anything else....

Ah, redpoint5 wants an AGW denier book written for him, because redpoint5 can't do the mathematics:
AGW deniers continue pumping the 15 (20?) year old line, even today:
RosscoWlg said... As for Wind power and solar power there is a huge bank of data telling you that it is barking up the wrong tree. Green tech is a failure....

[litesong]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Until then all we have is their raw data.

Since AGW deniers can't do science themselves, all they got is AGW denier raw "sigh-ants", directly off the exxon propaganda boards.