08-01-2023, 01:51 AM
|
#311 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,927
Thanks: 8,210
Thanked 8,985 Times in 7,422 Posts
|
AI reproduces the biases of the training set, in new and novel ways. The programmers don't know what it will come up with.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-01-2023, 01:53 AM
|
#312 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,894
Thanks: 4,346
Thanked 4,501 Times in 3,462 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
How could we be sure a so-called artificial "intelligence" would never reproduce the biases of its creators/programmers?
|
It would, by definition.
The AI model is defining what is "good" and what is "bad". It randomly makes many decisions and evaluates if the outcome achieved "good" or "bad". After many iterations, it develops a framework for what is "good" and what is "bad".
The programmed good and bad is all that AI is.
This is the basis for all of the dystopian fiction that imagines AI taking "good" to an extreme, to the exclusion of everything else that we failed to incorporate as good.
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 02:49 AM
|
#313 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,701 Times in 1,519 Posts
|
It's a much more complex deal than what is shown by the media and the AI developers.
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 10:50 AM
|
#314 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,482
Thanks: 563
Thanked 1,222 Times in 1,079 Posts
|
And science fiction is rife with examples of "good" turning out to be rather evil in intent
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 01:32 PM
|
#315 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,927
Thanks: 8,210
Thanked 8,985 Times in 7,422 Posts
|
Science fiction and Presidentiai runs.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 06:18 PM
|
#316 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,927
Thanks: 8,210
Thanked 8,985 Times in 7,422 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
The AI model is defining what is "good" and what is "bad". It randomly makes many decisions and evaluates if the outcome achieved "good" or "bad". After many iterations, it develops a framework for what is "good" and what is "bad".
|
Here ya go: Finetuning Llama 2 in your own cloud environment, privately
There won't be a monolithic bias, you can roll your own. I followed this for the first half, until Unpacking the recipe.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 06:24 PM
|
#317 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,894
Thanks: 4,346
Thanked 4,501 Times in 3,462 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
|
The problem is the Pareto Principle will play out, with AIs having a small initial advantage iterating rapidly and eliminating competition.
It's going to kill the 1st amendment either directly (we will be brainwashed into thinking freedom of speech is not worth it), or indirectly (shadow banned, etc).
The same mechanism is what causes everyone to use Google despite them being evil. Sure, there are alternatives and a handful of people use them, but it's insignificant.
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 07:30 PM
|
#318 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,927
Thanks: 8,210
Thanked 8,985 Times in 7,422 Posts
|
'The-glass-is-a-quarter-full'? So long as 4Chan is there, there is hope. And the EFF:
boingboing.net/2023/08/02: Cory Doctorow's new book on beating big tech at its own game
Quote:
The book presents an array of policy solutions aimed at dismantling the monopolistic power of Big Tech, making the internet a more open and user-focused space. Key among these solutions is the concept of interoperability, which would allow users to take their apps, data, and content with them when they decide to leave a service, thus reducing the power of tech platforms.
Quote:
Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.
The Internet Con isn't just an analysis of where en****tification comes from: it's a detailed, shovel-ready policy prescription for halting en****tification, throwing it into reverse and bringing back the old, good internet.
|
|
**** Thank you, Mods.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 08:03 PM
|
#319 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,894
Thanks: 4,346
Thanked 4,501 Times in 3,462 Posts
|
Hey, I learned new terminology.
All results are dependent on the will of the people. The people like crappy things. That's why we have Facebook and not Myspace.
Whatever is the least effort, and maximizes the offloading of agency to something else is what people will choose.
So, we'll have AI that feeds us lies, because it will be easier. The machines aren't going to forcefully insert us into the Matrix, we're going to impatiently ask how soon we can reserve a spot.
|
|
|
08-02-2023, 11:20 PM
|
#320 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,927
Thanks: 8,210
Thanked 8,985 Times in 7,422 Posts
|
Where are we going and why are we in this handbasket?
Quote:
https://www.reddit.com › r › InsightfulQuestions › comments › kgk4rr › do_you_think_its_true_that_90_of_everything_is
Do you think it's true that "90% of everything is crap"? AKA ... - Reddit
Sturgeon's law (or Sturgeon's revelation) is an adage that states that "ninety percent of everything is crap." The reason I think it's so interesting is because it ties in with the Pareto Principle, which is claims that: for many outcomes roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of the causes (the "vital few").
|
Sturgeon the Revelator.
This whole Excluded Middle thing bothers me. No room for nuance -- "yer either wit us or again' us". It's been said that sometimes people can't tell good news from bad.
AI is doing wonders for 3D printed shelf brackes.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
________________
.
.Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
|
|
|