Cosmic Catastrophe

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by Piotrsko

1 yes
2 yes
3 no: ever hear of power steering fluid?
4 need carbon also
5 other processes operate.in sun to make them, accelerator is an earth requirement but nukes.work also
6 yup
7 so far

3) a fluid particle exerting a force on another fluid particle would simply result in a displacement, as they have total degrees of freedom of movement, even some compression if they contain entrained gases.
4) carbon was present at the time of Earth's creation, originally-sourced from exploding stars.
5) while true for steller objects, not so for Earth's lower mantle. There is no possible 'strike-slip' stress-strain taking place within a magma. It just yields, as a fluid, or plastic deformation when loaded. And since there's nothing but magma in the lower mantle, there's nothing which can affect atoms in a crystal lattice structure.

[aerohead]

https://www.cnn.com/2021/10/01/world...scn/index.html

[freebeard]

Yikes! Autoplaying video.

I had just finished watching The Angry Astronaut: UPDATED!! NASA Lucy Mission - Why EVERYONE should care about this expedition!!

It's about a 12-year mission to go where no robotic probe has gone before......

The hope is for gravity-free raw materials and an outer defense against Earth-threatening stray asteroids.

[freebeard]

www.netzerowatch.com: New study confirms Sun/Cosmic-Ray climate connection

The observational data indicate that the Earth absorbs almost 2 Watts per square metre additional energy within 4 to 6 days of the cosmic-ray minimum. Such a large effect is a major surprise since the general consensus of the climate community, recently expressed in the 2021 released IPCC report AR6 (chapter 7.3.4.5), is that, “… the GCR [galactic cosmic rays] effect on CCN [cloud condensation nuclei] is too weak to have any detectable effect on climate and no robust association was found between GCR and cloudiness. … There is high confidence that GCRs contribute a negligible ERF [effective radiative forcing] over the period 1750 to 2019.”

These new results show the IPCC’s conclusion will need to be reassessed. Two Watts per square metre can be compared with the IPCC report’s estimate of solar effective radiative forcing over the period 1750 to 2019 of only 0.01 Watts per square metre (obtained by only considering solar irradiance changes).

“We now have simultaneous observations of decreases cosmic rays, aerosols, clouds, and the energy budget” says professor Nir Shaviv.

The solar effects in this study are too short-lived to have a lasting effect on the climate, but they point the way to research that could uncover how the mechanism works on longer time scales. “It could be that the effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – the so-called climate sensitivity – might be smaller than is deduced from climate models when this effect is taken into account,” adds professor Svensmark.

So even IPCC 6 needs updating. ....because new information has come to light, man.

[Piotrsko]

One publication does not mark a trend. Whether it is true or not, more data needs to be obtained to verify if it is a data point or an anomaly

[freebeard]

We're drowning in data. This took 60 years to sort out:

Huge Magnetic Tunnel Seems To Surround The Solar System

Even 4chan is aware of the micronova.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

www.netzerowatch.com: New study confirms Sun/Cosmic-Ray climate connection


So even IPCC 6 needs updating. ....because new information has come to light, man.

I recognize some of the members from other machines. I myself would not be moved by anything they had to say, and for reasons which we've been expressly forbidden to discuss.
Free speech is a double-edged sword.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Yikes! Autoplaying video.

I had just finished watching The Angry Astronaut: UPDATED!! NASA Lucy Mission - Why EVERYONE should care about this expedition!!

It's about a 12-year mission to go where no robotic probe has gone before......

The hope is for gravity-free raw materials and an outer defense against Earth-threatening stray asteroids.

The host appears un-acquainted with the concept of wasting peoples valuable time. At 3-minutes he could have told me what I needed to know. Instead he pursued rambling banter.
I bailed.

[freebeard]

What bothers me is while they are rambling on they keep re-running stock footage that may be marginally connected to the subject. Some work better as an audio stream.... at 1.5X.

[aerohead]

Humans don't appear to have the facility to process audio information, as a sole means of communication.
Even Bucky Fuller refused to broach a topic, unless he had detailed illustrations or models, to help convey the concept.
For the uninitiated, any person accessible online, who can speak for 20-plus minutes, may get an automatic 'pass', as the viewer may make the presumption that, the ability to stay on target for that length of time somehow implies a command of the topic. A potentially fatal presumption, at a time when we can least afford such things.
Don't wake me!