I did some pressure testing for the separation edges I've had on for awhile. My pitot tube mount wasn't the best and would rotate a little bit so I think I need to modify it and re-test before drawing any conclusions. Possibly use a different road too. Speed limit was 45, I did 50 MPH.
My mount:
I used a holesaw to drill a hole in the broken bumper cover. I thought there was going to be a foam core, but it was actually hollow. Initially the pole was a tight fit, but after driving for a few miles it loosened up. I used some duct tape to hold it in place, which worked fairly well.
On the end of the pole is this. A coiled up coat hanger plus the pitot tube held on with some heat shrink. It was a tight fit over the pole and then I used some electrical tape to secure it even better.
I tested in the 4 spots shown here (tail lights and bumper). Units were converted from inches of water.
Modified light: -27.4 Pa (-24.9 Pa & -29.9)
Stock light: -29.85 Pa (-39.8 Pa & -19.9 Pa)
Modified bumper: -31.1 Pa (-34.8 Pa & -27.37 Pa)
Stock bumper: -34.85 (-47.3 Pa & -22.39 Pa)
I could see the mount rotate (not much, maybe 10* or so) as I drove so I know that was messing with the readings. Not an oscillation, just a change in direction. Probably because of the reverse in direction and therefor crosswind side.
So initially we have 8% lower on the lights and 11% on the bumper. I think I can say the separation edges works, but need to work on the mount to say how much with any confidence.
__________________
1973 Fiat 124 Special
1975 Honda Civic CVCC 4spd
1981 Kawasaki KZ750E
1981 Kawasaki KZ650 CSR
1983 Kawasaki KZ1100-A3
1986 Nissan 300zx Turbo 5 spd
1995 Chevy Astro RWD (current project)
1995 Mercury Tracer
2017 Kawasaki VersysX 300
2022 Corolla Hatchback 6MT
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6s...LulDUQ8HMj5VKA