11-27-2009, 10:10 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I've read that there is a reasonable aspect ratio between the width and length of the "T" in reverse trikes that should be something like .75:1 (longer than wide), but I don't recall the reference.. I read it "en passant", and it may have been entirely false. Seems logical, though... if you've got a 75 inch front track, a 100 inch separation between the front and rear axle centers seems proper.
I would be inclined to think there's just more to it than that, though... such as center of gravity, etc.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
11-27-2009, 11:09 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
Hi-Tech Redneck
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
|
If I had a Metro truck, I would go all out on it............
Visor
Stacks (Tri-Stacks?)
Running boards
Bed rails
Dual whip CB antennas
Grille Gaurd
KC Hi lights
Yeeehaw!
__________________
GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 12:39 AM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
So what would you do with a Caravan? LOL. Friend wants to put it on a Blazer frame and rock 33's!
Man, rednecks...
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 12:41 AM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Mullet
If I had a Metro truck, I would go all out on it............
Visor
Stacks (Tri-Stacks?)
Running boards
Bed rails
Dual whip CB antennas
Grille Gaurd
KC Hi lights
Yeeehaw!
|
I'd make it a dually. lol
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 12:44 AM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonMPG
I'd make it a dually. lol
|
On the front tires? :P
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 02:07 AM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
On the front tires? :P
|
nah, on the trunk...lol
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 02:11 AM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I just wondered, cuz ya know... drive tires and all...
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 02:23 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
electricman
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 57
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I've heard of High Schools Students that have 'pickup' modded the Geo B4, so we know it can be done - and the eBay pic Proves it - and - hey it's a mod that (probably) saves on weight! So - that's better at slow speeds - less weight to accelerate = more eco friendly - hence - here we are on 'ecomodder'!.
It the AeroCap was made lighter weight than the stock - I am betting your aero would be better, and your weight penalty would be small over the current (pictured) style of pickup mod. You could make it wiith foam - like mine essentially - then fibreglass it using epoxy resins, and then - just disolve out the foam with some old Gasoline! A Bit oa a small RC Modeler Trick for small Airplane fuselages! Robert
Last edited by electricman; 11-28-2009 at 02:24 AM..
Reason: spelling error
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 02:47 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490
Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6 90 day: 31.12 mpg (US) Red - '00 Honda Insight Prius - '05 Toyota Prius 3 - '18 Tesla Model 3 90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
My suggestion was streamlining the three wheeler, though. The initial RR loss would probably be insignificant until the extra weight of the chassis was shed, but as the project were to progress, it would take a better chunk of the RR away as well. IF you've got less weight on a tire, it's bound to have lower frictional loss.
|
RR doesn't change unless you swap in different tires, only the power needed to roll it due to whatever drop in weight. Technically, there may be a drop due to having three bearings instead of four, but I don't think it would be measurable.
|
|
|
11-28-2009, 02:50 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
I don't think that's right... the tire's RR is measured at a specific load rating, but it doesn't always apply to all situations. If you load a tire less, it will have less rolling resistance. We've already proven this by overinflating tires, or removing weight from vehicles, and recording coast-down times.
I believe RR tests are done at max pressure and max load, but I don't recall specifically... seems I forget more about this stuff than I learn lately.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|