03-24-2014, 10:32 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
The "misspelling" was on purpose...ala' thumb-tack.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-25-2014, 12:43 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Got MPG?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330
The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
|
I visited cleanmpg over 2 years ago (I just checked) I found this site to be more friendly and helpful as well as down to earth, which is my style. If I could figure out how to delete my user over there I would as I don't plan to go back. Ecomodder is just a better fit for me and I am glad I found it as it has been very helpful.
__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.
|
|
|
03-25-2014, 02:00 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ptero
You mean "tact." When I realized political correctness was destroying my country, I said to hell with it. Back to being forthright and saying exactly what I think. People who don't like it can go **** themselves.
|
No real problem with saying what you think, though you perhaps ought to recall the old saying about it being better to keep silent and be thought an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Just for example, consider a few of the idiocies in this sentence:
Quote:
It is impossible to mine lithium in Bolivia, haul it to the Pacific coast of South America, transport it by ship to South Korea, make it into batteries, ship those batteries to Detroit, install and run them in hybrid cars for 7 to 10 years, perform end-of-life recycling and still be able to justify ANY mpg gain.
|
Even on the charitable assumption that your economic calculations there are correct, the assumptions on which they're based are just plain wrong.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2014, 02:07 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanBurn
I visited cleanmpg over 2 years ago (I just checked) I found this site to be more friendly and helpful as well as down to earth, which is my style.
|
You know, a community.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
Last edited by Fat Charlie; 03-25-2014 at 02:14 PM..
|
|
|
03-25-2014, 02:28 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
The OEM Motorcraft battery in the F150 is now 20 years old! I know- lead/acid- but still! Just started her up yesterday in single digit temps after it sat for weeks. Color me impressed!
|
|
|
03-25-2014, 03:17 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
the assumptions on which they're based are just plain wrong.
|
Lithium ion batteries do have issues with high and low temperature, so lifespan probably won't be that long for cars in very hot or cold climates... or at least lifespan at 80%.
But yeah, too many assumptions. I also quail at the assumption that anything that has to be shipped automatically causes more GHG... what's important to note is that the huge volume of parts and items shipped via cargo vessel means that the amount of fuel used to ship any single part of a car is quite small, and that mass producing in one place and mass shipping it to other places might have a smaller environmental impact than creating big, expensive production facilities at multiple locations.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to niky For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2014, 04:56 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,845
Thanks: 4,333
Thanked 4,489 Times in 3,452 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niky
I also quail at the assumption that anything that has to be shipped automatically causes more GHG... what's important to note is that the huge volume of parts and items shipped via cargo vessel means that the amount of fuel used to ship any single part of a car is quite small, and that mass producing in one place and mass shipping it to other places might have a smaller environmental impact than creating big, expensive production facilities at multiple locations.
|
This logic is also what causes me to question the value of "eating local". Does it really take less energy for a small farmer to drive a pickup truck around with relatively little food than a large corporation to ship massive quantities of food? If the local small farm takes less energy, then prices should reflect this efficiency.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-25-2014, 06:58 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 121
Thanks: 38
Thanked 19 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
The OEM Motorcraft battery in the F150 is now 20 years old! I know- lead/acid- but still! Just started her up yesterday in single digit temps after it sat for weeks. Color me impressed!
|
That's great!
|
|
|
|