05-13-2009, 08:41 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by binarycortex
I was under the impression that diffusers created extra downforce (Formula 1) which is bad for FE. Any Thoughts?
|
Downforce itself isn't bad for fuel economy.
A diffuser is like a kamm back for the underside of the car. A kamm back creates lift, a diffuser creates downforce, and both reduce drag
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-13-2009, 08:46 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Punk
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 131
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
ya so down force created by generating drag is bad for FE but down force created by reducing drag.. is just reducing drag as far as FE is concerned. Right?
Thanks for the input guys, still no takers on the angles, huh?
|
|
|
05-13-2009, 09:11 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
diffuser
All the info you need is in the stickys and seminars.You'll be able to go it alone.
|
|
|
05-13-2009, 09:48 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
HyperHopeful
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I think a diffuser will help reduce drag. The air going over the car is high velocity/low pressure and the air going under is low velocity/high pressure. Thats what creates lift, and therefore, drag. If you can reduce that pressure differential by increasing the velocity of the air going under the car you should reduce drag.
|
|
|
05-13-2009, 11:22 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
FYI, here's the info on undertrays Phil contributed:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...html#post29811
For what it's worth, I've never seen a low-drag vehicle with a "finned" undertray - they're just smooth. The fins are something I've only ever seen on racing vehicles (or wannabe racing vehicles). That may be significant. Something to think about.
|
|
|
05-13-2009, 11:32 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Another thought: start with a flat, slightly upward angled undertray. Tuft test it. Tufts are your friends. (Use a remote camera to record the results.)
If you find that there's attached flow on your undertray, you can study the direction of the tufts to discover flow direction. If you put a "fin" at any other angle than the direction indicated by the tufts, you'll probably be increasing drag through vortex formation off the fin(s).
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-26-2009, 12:26 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
lurker's apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942
PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab 90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
For what it's worth, I've never seen a low-drag vehicle with a "finned" undertray - they're just smooth. The fins are something I've only ever seen on racing vehicles (or wannabe racing vehicles). That may be significant. Something to think about.
|
This is a bit elementary looking but it is nevertheless very instructive. According to them diffusers, particularly rear diffusers, and major players in the aero game:
Superhachi.com - Downforce Basics
To quote that page:
"The most effective diffusers are closed on the sides by walls that extend close to the ground, in effect forming a sealed tunnel (sometimes referred to as a "ground effect tunnel") only open at the ends. Because air cannot come in from the sides, it is forced to accelerate through the entrance of the diffuser to fill it. This acceleration decreases the pressure of the air at the inlet of the diffuser creating downforce. "
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 04:56 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 419
Thanks: 4
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeanBurninating
I was actually going to go a little cheaper than carbon fiber... haha. I was just going get some abs plastic sheets cut and use one sheet as the belly pan piece and chemically "weld" the fins on like a t joint style. So just five pieces together and screw it into the bottom of the trunk. I think it will end up being about $120 to make if I buy thicker plastic and get it custom cut at TAP plastic. I don't have a table saw....
|
Ahh, TAP plastics, I know them well. They do good/fast work, pretty darn cheap too. Good choice
__________________
Adjusted for my driving habits. 80%city/20%Highway.
20mpg city/30mpg highway or bust! Check out my mods so far
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 08:04 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Hermit
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The woods
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
|
|
|
05-26-2009, 12:15 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ireland
Posts: 507
Thanks: 111
Thanked 32 Times in 22 Posts
|
The last post in the mx5 forum is interesting:"You need a maximum ground clearnace of 75mm to achieve any effect. "
Shock horror!! Are they talking about top end speed? I'd hate to go to all the bother and get little or no FE benefit!
ollie
Last edited by vtec-e; 05-26-2009 at 12:31 PM..
|
|
|
|