05-21-2014, 01:55 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
I think that the one aspect of driving that can be predicted the least is human drivers, so for autonomous driving to be safest, it would need to be 100%. What would they do, mandate that new cars come with this standard and that existing cars be upgraded? How many cars would they allow to receive this? Probably only ones meeting new and stricter emission and safety standards.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 02:14 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Look out for Google cars!
It's already been tested on our highways, remember the 1997 NAHSC autonomous Buicks platooning on the I-5 HOV lanes in California.
Darn Google, already had a head start and its wonderful, Luddites!
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 02:16 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Not exactly news: Nevada has had similar regulations for years.
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 02:46 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
NightKnight
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 314
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
I think that the one aspect of driving that can be predicted the least is human drivers, so for autonomous driving to be safest, it would need to be 100%. What would they do, mandate that new cars come with this standard and that existing cars be upgraded? How many cars would they allow to receive this? Probably only ones meeting new and stricter emission and safety standards.
|
The current generation of autonomous vehicles does not require that all vehicles are autonomous. Other vehicles are obstacles to be avoided. Yes, to be "safest", all should be autonomous, but I can already foresee the firestorm if there is a hint that ALL vehicles must be autonomous...
However, even in the case of a non-autonomous driver trying to do something incredibly stupid (like run a red light or cross over into oncoming traffic), I would expect an autonomous vehicle react "more correctly" than the vast majority of human drivers... that is, the autonomous vehicle won't panic or freeze up.
__________________
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 03:04 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Perhaps we should just eliminate humans and have everything be autonomous.
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 03:18 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Call it the "Herbie Law"
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 04:10 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter
However, even in the case of a non-autonomous driver trying to do something incredibly stupid (like run a red light or cross over into oncoming traffic), I would expect an autonomous vehicle react "more correctly" than the vast majority of human drivers... that is, the autonomous vehicle won't panic or freeze up.
|
Autonomous vehicles would have reactive systems deploy in the event of unavoidable catastrophic events; relatively safer collision avoidance (non-autonomous vehicles, vehicle failures or 'sudden' obstacles) maneuvers, seat adjustments/belt tensioners, pre-collision slower airbag deployments, first-responder calls and location tracking (water submersion, cliff falls, MH 370...)
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 04:30 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flakbadger
I feel like within the next 10-15 years, we will be seeing "autonomous vehicle only" lanes in busy cities, just like you see carpool lanes now. As more autonomous-capable vehicles enter the roadways, there will be busy sections of freeway that are predominantly autonomous-only, and soon there will only be single lanes for human-driven vehicles. I'll bet you anything the stop-and-go bull**** would be reduced.
|
Don't be too sure:
Physics Buzz: Jerks actually reduce the risk of traffic jams
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 04:32 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
What? The cutting-edge technologies of Autocorrect and Siri do not inspire you with confidence when your life is on the line?
|
Where does the passenger push CTL-ALT-DEL when the blue-screen of death suddenly appears on the NAV screen?
|
|
|
05-21-2014, 04:46 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
1. I look forward to having my car drop me off, go home and recharge, and then pick me up at a location I specify with the phone app I'm using. No more looking for parking spots, no more parking fees.
|
That will double your fuel use and increase traffic congestion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
2. Traffic lights are annoying and inefficient. One day cars will calculate the most efficient speed to travel, be aware of other vehicles and mesh through intersections without stopping. No more stopping until you arrive at your destination.
|
How would automated car fix that? Where I live now, all the traffic lights are triggered off sensors in the street. This often leads to randomness in the timing of the lights.
This drives me batty since I used to drive live near a city that used timed lights and I could drive from one side to the other without stopping! Without an automated car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
I wonder why people are worried by this and want to resist the inevitable?
|
I actually enjoy driving and a car is more to me than an appliance to get from point A to point B.
I've also worked in IT and often saw failures in automation when unexpected events happened...
However, I'm not really against them, I just don't want one for myself.
|
|
|
|