Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2015, 08:07 AM   #51 (permalink)
Carbon Abuser
 
iamnotahippee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 78

Olaf - '03 Honda Civic Hybrid

Sven - '06 Volvo Xc90 2.5t

Work Truck - '04 Chevy Silverado 3500
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
I am jealous of your 'burb! After having 2 different company trucks with the 6.5 in them, i have a soft spot for the old rattle bangers. In good repair, and driven patiently, they can return decent mpg numbers. Moving the fuel module is a very good idea. They sell pre made harnesses to make the move. Got luck with the Ole thing!

__________________
1986 Chevy C-10 10mpg Grandpa's Truck
2004 Chevy 3500 diesel 10mpg The work Truck
2003 Honda Civic Hybrid 5 spd ?? Mpg My Carbon Pentance
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to iamnotahippee For This Useful Post:
101Volts (11-12-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-16-2015, 10:04 AM   #52 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Where are you going to find a manual steering box suitable to the Suburban? BTW maybe you would want to have a bigger steering wheel to alleviate the effort due to the longer lever extension from the center of the steering wheel...
No idea, I got the idea from JacobAziza (who's a member here) and my P.S. system, while working, did have black fluid in it when I got it. I'm not in a rush to switch it. Details: Big Orange Work Truck - 1983 Ford F-250 Fuel Economy - EcoModder.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by deejaaa View Post
the cost of the bypass will NEVER be worth the ROI to save anything, if it's even true. advertisers will say anything to sell the product.
i have a bypass filter. it's big. used for several years. took it off of one to run on the other but it now sits on the shelf. cleaner oil can be used longer, don't expect more MPG, but it needs to be analyzed and there goes the savings from keeping the same oil.
I'm still interested in the Bypass Filter idea, thing is that it's more to prevent wear on the engine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aardvarcus View Post
I assume you have or are going to start bathing them in some sort of liquid-wrench type fluid to help if they are corrosion seized. From my construction experience, if you are putting loads of force on a T-25 bit the best quality bits you can get are the Dewalt "Impact Ready" bits, typically available at big box stores in two packs. That would help from rounding out the heads like lower quality bits sometimes will. After several treatments of antiseize and putting a good T-25 driver in a 1/4" socket in a decent ratchet/breaker bar I would think they would come loose (or shear off...).
I used Seafoam Deep Creep, then I took some of them off and others actually broke off high above the roof line. It looks like I may have to destroy the roof rack supports to get at some and start turning them with a vice grip, after soaking in fluid again.

... I ended up ripping the insert for one screw hole out which I epoxied back in, at least it won't rust; I'm not sure it's stable enough to screw anything into now or if it'll rip the epoxy off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotahippee View Post
I am jealous of your 'burb! After having 2 different company trucks with the 6.5 in them, i have a soft spot for the old rattle bangers. In good repair, and driven patiently, they can return decent mpg numbers. Moving the fuel module is a very good idea. They sell pre made harnesses to make the move. Got luck with the Ole thing!
Hm, you sure that jealousy is healthy? Maybe you should check.

I'm not sure if the PCM was moved or not, there's no heat sink. If it wasn't I'm interested in switching it.

I have very little fuel in the tank now, so I'm able to remove the tank and see if I can find where it's been leaking. I saw there's such a nifty thing as "Fuel Tank Epoxy" which I may use, or maybe it's a gasket near the top that's leaking? At the same time I have in mind coating above the fuel tank with POR-15 and cleaning the tank out.
__________________




Last edited by 101Volts; 11-12-2015 at 09:05 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2015, 03:24 PM   #53 (permalink)
Not banned yet
 
deejaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas Coast, close to Houston
Posts: 907

Blue - '03 Chevy S-10, LS
Thanks: 423
Thanked 265 Times in 212 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101Volts View Post
I'm still interested in the Bypass Filter idea, thing is that it's more to prevent wear on the engine.......
but I thought you said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101Volts View Post
I've been reading that cleaner oil = higher MPGs.
.....
__________________
2003 S-10, 2.2L, 5 speed, ext cab long bed.
So far: DRL delete, remove bed mount toolbox.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to deejaaa For This Useful Post:
101Volts (09-18-2015)
Old 09-17-2015, 12:57 PM   #54 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
I use synthetic oil and a bypass filter.

Never noticed it to improve fuel mileage but I do go two years between oil changes. The lab says I'm discarding good oil but 30,000 miles on oil makes my old-school nerves hurt.

But a 14 quart oil change with pricey synthetic dictates oil changes are not something you want to do real often.

BTW: 322,000 miles and no wear metal showing in oil analysis.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
101Volts (09-18-2015)
Old 09-18-2015, 01:34 PM   #55 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by deejaaa View Post
but I thought you said... (quote in reply)
Yes, I did; it was meant with interest toward higher MPG possibilities but I didn't mention in the same post "less wear". Either way, it's something I'd like to check out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
I use synthetic oil and a bypass filter.

Never noticed it to improve fuel mileage but I do go two years between oil changes. The lab says I'm discarding good oil but 30,000 miles on oil makes my old-school nerves hurt.

But a 14 quart oil change with pricey synthetic dictates oil changes are not something you want to do real often.

BTW: 322,000 miles and no wear metal showing in oil analysis.
Thanks. You do EOCing if I recall correctly? I won't have that luxury without a manual transmission, the last rebuild was enough to last a while.

In other news, I learned the rear wheel wells (maybe the front ones too, I didn't look yet) need repaired from rust corrosion. I didn't see it earlier because of the plastic arch covers, thank God they're plastic so I can get them back on easily. I also coated the rear differential plate with POR15 after knocking loose metal off, it was looking pretty crusty.

I have a question: can I pump the front tires to 80 PSI Cold and not have abnormal tread wear? The doorjamb says "55" and I have them at 60 now, I'm beginning to wonder if it just said "55" for passenger comfort and nothing else as the front wheels are closer to the driver.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2015, 07:16 PM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Air Damming we do go. ♪





I decided to get something a bit more rugged than lawn edging, so it's some floor mat attached to the bumper with plastic that I bent and stainless hardware. It's attached in nine places across the bumper.

I also set the tire PSI to 80 all around. The doorjamb says "55 Front, 80 Rear" though so is this to prevent front tire wear or do you think I could go higher like I did without abnormal wear? I think it depends on the tire used, so maybe asking this is odd but I do seek to know.
__________________




Last edited by 101Volts; 10-19-2015 at 07:39 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 08:53 PM   #57 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Added the Cold Air Intake. It's made with a plastic downspout (which I painted black,) clothes dryer hose and electrical tape.





I'm not sure how well it aids fuel economy if at all, but the air intake temperature went down much quicker after hill climbs than before.

I also had the front tires at 65 this time since my lower back was bothering me from riding this car, but that may have not been caused entirely from the tire pressure; I later found I had the seat adjusted oddly.
__________________




Last edited by 101Volts; 11-12-2015 at 09:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 09:00 PM   #58 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 931

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 835
Thanked 490 Times in 309 Posts
From what I have seen and read, diesels love cold air. I would think it would help, but time will tell.

From the previous post, I think the place card sets the front tire pressure so low to improve driver comfort. E load range tires can be rough... you might can say its to preserve the suspension parts, but idk of any testing that has been done one way or another.

I like the air dam!
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr

Last edited by BabyDiesel; 11-13-2015 at 12:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BabyDiesel For This Useful Post:
101Volts (11-12-2015)
Old 11-12-2015, 09:23 PM   #59 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
101Volts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 506

Woody - '90 Mercury Grand Marquis Wagon LS
Last 3: 19.57 mpg (US)

Brick - '99 Chevrolet K2500 Suburban LS
Last 3: 12.94 mpg (US)

M. C. - '01 Chevrolet Impala Base
90 day: 17.09 mpg (US)

R. J. - '05 Ford Explorer 4wd
90 day: 16.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 934
Thanked 34 Times in 28 Posts
Thanks.

I also noticed a coolant leak. It's in an easily accessible area, thankfully. This car's looking more like a hypermiler has it now that I got two visibly clear modifications on it. Maybe I'll put covers on the rear wheel wells, I can't say how much it'll help but it's a step in the right direction for using less fuel.

One more thing; I've been looking at Renewable Lubricants' products and they have fuel conditioner for both summer and winter. Does anyone here have experience with it?
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2015, 10:54 PM   #60 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,187

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eel-32213.html

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
1999, chevrolet, diesel, suburban





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com