The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

[freebeard]

You have no credible source for arson being the reason for the Australian wildfires. It's bunk.

You'll have to define credible source. Snopes? Infowars? Look for the baseline of inadvertent and deliberate human-caused fires historically. I've seen it but I can't be bothered to find it again.*

The climate that we USED to have was relatively stable, and life had evolved to thrive in it. It has vastly changed - and it is rapidly changing even faster now. It means that plants and animals are dying, and species are disappearing.

Originally Posted by myself

science.slashdot.org:Chinese Paddlefish, One of the World's Largest Fish, Survived the Meteor That Killed the Dinosaurs. But They Couldn't Survive Communism.

It was pollution that kilt the Chinese Paddlefish, not the climate.

There won't be an ice age any time soon:

Logic would dictate that infrastructure be retooled for extremes of heat/cold air pressure excursions and EMF.

The most that any one person could do on their own would be to grow acres of hemp for the seed oil and then decoricate the stalks and use the hurds to make hempcrete. Atmospheric CO2 fixed with hydrated lime on an annual basis. The fiber becomes particle board or canvas and the seed oil used for paint, possibly paint-on self-nano-assembling solar panels.

Bamboo has it's place as well. Bamboo bicycle frame with hemp tape joins

https://woodworking.stackexchange.co...boo-bike-frame

If you have a house and a bicycle, anything else is stealing the childhoods of un-aborted babies.

edit: *IIRC about twice the normal rate.

2nd edit: The Oceans

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywKVfwJMGzM

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

I didn't say another ice age would be soon, I said and you quoted me as saying "a few thousand years". Is a few thousand years soon to you?
Just looking at the last 5 ice ages our next one will be at least 1,000 years from now with a low probability, 4,000 years being likely and definitely by 7,000 years.

Let me define "not any time soon" - not in the next several million years, at least. The natural carbon sequestration process (weathering) takes a long time. If natural grasslands come back, then we could get back below 350ppm quickly.

Here's what the radical Texans are doing:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNXisoMYi_Y

Question: why are construction projects doing their work AT NIGHT in Arizona?

[freebeard]

Let me define "not any time soon" - not in the next several million years, at least.

I call shenanigans. Interglacials, such as we are in right now, are 1/10th the length of glacials.

Ice age - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_ages
The current geological period, the Quaternary, which began about 2.6 million years ago and extends into the present, is marked by warm and cold episodes, cold phases called glacials (Quaternary ice age) lasting about 100,000 years, and which are then interrupted by the warmer interglacials which lasted about 10,000-15,000 years.

If natural grasslands come back, then we could get back below 350ppm quickly.

Why not hemplands?

Now I will watch the video.

edit:
The vehicle-to-grid vs vehicle-to-home discussion is interesting.

Texas' third Coast is out of the tidal power game, Alaska has the fjords.

The vintage gas pump converted to a charge point is neat.

Austin is interesting, but Texas also has Boca Chica[SpaceX].

[NeilBlanchard]

https://www.theguardian.com/australi...n-false-claims

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/9/2105833...ning-explained

Bushfires, bots and arson claims: Australia flung in the global disinformation spotlight

https://www.nbcnews.com/science/envi...ation-n1112736

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDvmAMsYwNY

https://www.theguardian.com/australi...lian-bushfires

https://www.dw.com/en/australias-bus...ate/a-51917618

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by freebeard

I call shenanigans. Interglacials, such as we are in right now, are 1/10th the length of glacials.


Why not hemplands?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGFAWzjO378

Grasslands are a natural environment and when grazed, they pump carbon into the soil. Nothing grazes on hemp - though it is a useful material.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgmssrVInP0

[NeilBlanchard]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC_2WXyORGA

[freebeard]

In 20 minutes you posted four videos with II[calculate]C 46 minutes of run time.
Pick the one you find most persuasive pleez.

edit:
Scott Adams touches on it, among other topics, at Episode 783 Scott Adams: #Loserthink Opinions on Iran, Google Shenanigans, Free Money, Bad Liars

Paraphrased, setting aside any arson, nothing the [bakka] Australian government could have done would make any difference as they are the victim of China.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Let me define "not any time soon" - not in the next several million years, at least. The natural carbon sequestration process (weathering) takes a long time. If natural grasslands come back, then we could get back below 350ppm quickly.

Here's what the radical Texans are doing:

Question: why are construction projects doing their work AT NIGHT in Arizona?

So no more ice ages?
What's your source on that?
Just remember you post something I'm going to read it and use it to eat you alive. I don't want to hear you cry like aero head.

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Your little video says "this interglacial is different than all the others". Duha. All the interglacial periods were unique in length temperature.
He "assumes the equator was inhospitable" 55 million years ago at global temperature maximum, but there was an explosion of life all over the planet.
He says the suns output between solar maximum and minimum is 0.1% difference, that's straight from aero heads favorite 1996 study that's been debunked for apparent casual, non scienific observations of one specific wavelength of UV and ignoring the entire sublight speed components of solar output.
The first believer to bring up orbital eccentricity. Brave man he could be stoned to death by the other believers for that.
Dude said a 200km wide asteroid killed the dinosaurs?
If a 200km rock hits the earth everything bigger than 995 cells dies.
Try to sell the Micheal mann hocky stick graph as being credible... funny because Mann was sued for fraud over this.
Then says we were going into an ice age until the late 20th warm up.
I seem to remember all the believers, neil, reddevil aero head all going crazy saying that the 1970s ice age scare was fake, made up, no one of scientific merit was saying that. But this guy with his temperature chart is saying that we were going into another ice age.
Neils "creditable" man made global warming promoter is claiming we were going into an ice age... to the church of climate change that's Blasphemy.
I dont think neil watched this video all the way through.

[freebeard]

I dont think neil watched this video all the way through.

NeilB wants capitalization. aerohead is alloneword.

I watched the one on Austin (pretty good), but not the six non-video links. Scott You-know-who says if there are 10 reasons, [likely] none of them are good.

Soil Carbon sounds interesting.

edit: It's hard to take this sort of thing....

08:29 ...that thing is about one
08:34 cubic kilometer now what that means is
08:36 every time the co2 concentration went up
08:38 by one part per million instead of it
08:40 going up as a colorless odorless gas one
08:43 of those popped up over a city will be
08:45 be taking a little bit more attention to
08:46 it okay so if there were 270 more of
08:48 those floating around over new york and
08:50 london and sydney just hovering there
08:53 people will be taking this a little bit
08:54 more seriously...

Seriously?

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

So no more ice ages?
Just remember you post something I'm going to read it and use it to eat you alive. I don't want to hear you cry like aero head.

I like you oil pan, which is why I'd like less of the ad hominems. aerohead is a good person, even if we disagree with things.