Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > The Unicorn Corral
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Closed Thread  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-27-2012, 10:35 AM   #71 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
I'm removing the links to this product & the company's site. There's too much blatant advertising and stock pumping going on here. (Anyone who wants to find it can just Google it.)

Anyone reposting the links can expect to be banned. No second chances.

Also see, FYI:

.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
mcrews (01-27-2012), t vago (01-27-2012)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-27-2012, 12:22 PM   #72 (permalink)
ECOModder
 
Mr. Previa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 84

RAV - '13 Toyota RAV4 XLE AWD
90 day: 27.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
LOL! ...now back to reading...
__________________
3585 pounds of twisted steel.
Recreational | Active | Vehicle | 4x4
...scratch that... AWD
 
Old 01-27-2012, 12:51 PM   #73 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Sherwood, CA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yes Google It.... I Agree. Do some DD for yourselves
 
Old 01-27-2012, 01:25 PM   #74 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceQuity View Post
There has been diminishing interest in the program however; the most recent report was issued in 2005
That's because when the EPA does the test they don't let anybody pull any tricks.
__________________
 
Old 01-27-2012, 05:11 PM   #75 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceQuity View Post



[link removed]
Wait what!?!?! so they are compairing the EPA limits to what was measured? did I read that right???

Not a before and after emmissions test?!?!?
 
Old 01-27-2012, 05:57 PM   #76 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnemy View Post
Wait what!?!?! so they are compairing the EPA limits to what was measured? did I read that right???

Not a before and after emmissions test?!?!?
Clever huh? Nothing like a little false advertising and official looking numbers to mislead people into thinking this little piece of bu//$h/t improves mileage and emissions.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
 
Old 01-27-2012, 06:22 PM   #77 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Let me see if I understand by way of an example.

I had a 66 mustang. I had a new engine installed 6 cylinder 200 ci 1 bll.
Since I live in CA I had to have it smogged.
The results were that the car was only at 10% of the allowable numbers.
So it was very clean compared to the standard for the model.
But my 1997 toyota avalon had better real numbers than the 66 mustang.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
 
Old 01-27-2012, 08:25 PM   #78 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Sherwood, CA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New California rules require cleaner cars

Los Angeles Times - By Bettina Boxall
January 27, 2012, 2:40 p.m.
California, long a national leader in cutting auto pollution, pushed the envelope further Friday when state regulators approved a suite of rules designed to cut greenhouse gas emissions from cars and put far more more pollution-free vehicles on the road in coming years.

The package of Air Resources Board regulations would require auto manufacturers to offer increasing numbers of zero or very low emission cars such as electric battery, hydrogen fuel cell and plug-in hybrid vehicles in California starting with model year 2018. By 2025, one in seven new autos sold in California, or roughly 1.4 million, would be ultra-clean, moving what is now a novelty into the mainstream.

Three years in the works, the new rules package also toughens standards for auto emissions that form smog and contribute to global warming.

“Today’s vote….represents a new chapter for clean cars in California and in the nation as a whole,” said board chair Mary Nichols.


Auto manufacturers are uneasy with some of the provisions but generally supported the package. “We know the board wants to push the automakers,” said Mike Love, national regulatory affairs manager for Toyota Motor Sales. “We said we’re willing to go along with you and do our best.”

The requirements are expected to drive up car prices. The board staff predicts that the advanced technologies needed to meet the new smog and greenhouse gas emission standards will add $1,900 to the sticker price of a new car in 2025. But that would be more than offset by $6,000 in estimated fuel costs over the life of the vehicle, according to the staff.

Zero-emission autos now make up a miniscule portion of the more than 26 million cars driven in California. There are a few hundred fuel cell cars and about 34,000 battery electric autos on the road.

“The fact that we are going to change what consumers can buy is one of the most important things we can do,” board member Ken Yeager said before the board’s 9-0 approval at the end of a two-day hearing in Los Angeles.

Manufacturers are poised to introduce a number of new electric and plug-in hybrid models. “This year two dozen or more new vehicles are going to come out in the market,” Love said. “Everyone is trying their idea for evs [electric vehicles], plug-ins.”

Nichols said there had been “a real change in attitudes on the part of auto companies that have seen the handwriting on the wall … The reality is that companies see the future is going to be in electric drivetrain vehicles. They’re moving there as fast they can.”

But whether there is strong enough demand to support robust sales remains to be seen.

“Automakers are mandated to build products that consumers are not mandated to buy,” said Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which includes Chrysler Group LLC,Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Co. “If the electric vehicle infrastructure is not in place, consumers may be reluctant to buy these technologies.”

Kelley Blue Book market analyst Jack Nerad predicted “the added expense and lesser versatility of the ‘environmental’ vehicles” will continue to make them less desirable to consumers. “So to reach the mandated volumes, they might well have to be sold at a loss so that their manufacturers can continue to do business in California. Buyers of conventional cars will pick up the remainder of the tab.”

One of the most disputed elements of the rules package centered on a clause that in the early years of the mandate gives credits to automakers who exceed the greenhouse gas emission standards by a certain amount. Those credits would reduce the number of electric, fuel cell and plug-in hybrids the companies had to offer in California.

Jay Friedland, legislative director of Plug in America, called it “a loophole you can drive a truck through” that will undermine the 2025 goal of having ultra-clean cars make up 15% of the new vehicles sold in the state.
 
Old 01-27-2012, 08:44 PM   #79 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 829
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceQuity View Post
entire news article snipped
Okay, now the spammer is just wasting space here.

Why not try answering the other valid points made here, instead?
 
Old 01-27-2012, 10:19 PM   #80 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lake Sherwood, CA
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Look it up... or ask the Air Resources Board.

Here is a green solution - SaviCorp's Patented DynoValve...
Which is the first electronically controlled PCV valve which fits most vehicles. DynoValve replaces your current PCV valve, which then recirculates the undetonated fuel back in your engine... Creating a new source for fuel, with immediate results that will range up to 10% to 30% more fuel efficiency and up to 90% decrease in emissions...Don't believe me... believe the Air Resources Board.

SaviCorp's DynoValve Surpasses 2025 EPA Standards by 71% to 97%, TODAY! Air Resources Board E.O. D-677 FEDERAL EMISSION TEST RESULTS - [link removed by admin]

What ever i say... Will not change your close minded heads.

 
Closed Thread  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com