Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-23-2018, 02:04 PM   #71 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Is that Tom Mix bar named for the early Western movie star? He died in a car wreck in 1940 in which a metal suitcase in his backseat of his Cord Phaeton struck him in the head and broke his neck.

Geez... better keep it.
Yeah, there was an overhead luggage rack and the back of the seats had no head rests, so the suitcase slid off the rack and struck him in the back of the head.

I don't think the bar is formally called a "Tom Mix bar", but rather that it's a nickname that was given to it.

Personally, I don't foresee something at foot level behind my seats striking me in the back of the head. I could potentially see more side impact crumple without the crossbeam, but it's really not a very big bar. I'd say it's 1/8" aluminum at best.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-23-2018, 09:46 PM   #72 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Removing that cross bar could cost you your life. I met this insight owner at a Del Taco when I used to work at the shop (cutting a long story short here) anyway, he ended up pulling out in front of a speeding motorcycle, and got T boned almost exactly where that bar is, just a hair more front. The bar prevented the vehicle from crumpling in at that spot, which definitely would have ended that man's life. I wish I still had the pictures, but it was a long time, and two phones ago.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
Ecky (07-24-2018), fusion210 (07-25-2018)
Old 07-24-2018, 07:28 AM   #73 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
Removing that cross bar could cost you your life. I met this insight owner at a Del Taco when I used to work at the shop (cutting a long story short here) anyway, he ended up pulling out in front of a speeding motorcycle, and got T boned almost exactly where that bar is, just a hair more front. The bar prevented the vehicle from crumpling in at that spot, which definitely would have ended that man's life. I wish I still had the pictures, but it was a long time, and two phones ago.
I would appreciate those pictures, if you can find them. Just looking at the numbers - approximately 2.6 car accident deaths per 100,000 in my state (per year) - it's hard to get excited about in a very personal way. To me it sounds like I'm far more likely to die of breathing in exhaust from other vehicles on the road. We're talking thousandths of a percent here, and I'm a pretty defensive driver to begin with.

Going a little further, 72% of those 2.6 per 100,000 had alcohol in their blood, and I don't drink. Approximately half weren't wearing their seatbelt, which I always do. And, only maybe half of those were side impact. So in perhaps over-simplifying math, it works out to about 0.182 deaths / 100,000, or a 0.00018% chance of me being killed (statistically) from a side impact in a given year, assuming I'm about as careless as the average driver. Maybe I increase that by half or more by removing the bar, or maybe not.

For comparison, 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer in their lives. Heart disease kills 1 in 4 men, and killed both my father and grandfather in their 50's. Their diets were poor. I think if I were to focus my efforts somewhere, eating better than they did and making sure I put on my seatbelt every time I get in my car might be a better use of my time than worrying about that bar.

EDIT: I'm considering relocating the bar a little lower, rather than removing it.

Last edited by Ecky; 07-24-2018 at 08:09 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2018, 05:10 PM   #74 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Yea sadly I don't have those pictures anymore. I mean you do whatever you think is best, it's your car, I just don't want to see you die because you removed something that wasn't supposed to be removed.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2018, 05:22 PM   #75 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,756

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,317
Thanked 4,472 Times in 3,437 Posts
My opinion on safety is that any cager is going to be more safe than a motorcycle. We're talking vanishingly unlikely scenarios that would result in dramatic injury.

Diet and exercise is what I recommend focusing on from a safety perspective.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
Ecky (07-25-2018), MetroMPG (07-25-2018)
Old 07-25-2018, 08:01 AM   #76 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
Yea sadly I don't have those pictures anymore. I mean you do whatever you think is best, it's your car, I just don't want to see you die because you removed something that wasn't supposed to be removed.
I'll see about putting a thick piece of angle with braces at the ends about where the bar was, but a little lower, so I can have a flat deck.

Ordered ~40 square feet of sound dampening butyl rubber.

Thinking of relocating the fuel fill lines as well.

Last edited by Ecky; 07-25-2018 at 08:10 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2018, 02:45 PM   #77 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Looks like I can roughly quantify lean burn's impact on fuel economy.

On my morning commute, which is ~11 miles and maybe half of it I can run lean, my most common readout is 73.3mpg. Sometimes I can manage a little higher, but I get this exact amount suspiciously frequently.

After installing an arduino to spoof the IMA signals and get the CEL to shut off, I lost lean burn. Conditions were almost ideal this morning on my way to work, it likely would have been a 75-80mpg day. I pulled in to the parking lot with 68.8mpg on the meter. So, I'm going to call it very approximately 10% in mixed driving.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-25-2018)
Old 07-25-2018, 03:29 PM   #78 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
If I recall, in my typical usage (mainly secondary highway driving on very lean-burn friendly routes with extensive aero mods), it was more like a ~33% increase, from ~75 mpg to ~100+ mpg.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2018, 03:35 PM   #79 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,077

ND Miata - '15 Mazda MX-5 Special Package
90 day: 39.72 mpg (US)

Oxygen Blue - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 54.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,904
Thanked 2,560 Times in 1,586 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
If I recally, in my typical usage (mainly secondary highway driving on very lean-burn friendly routes with extensive aero mods), it was more like a ~33% increase, from ~75 mpg to ~100+ mpg.
I find I'm still able to cruise at ~85mpg where I would be getting 90-100mpg with lean burn enabled, but I'm sure the delta would be larger, the larger the percent of cruising on level ground. I may do further testing though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2018, 12:47 AM   #80 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
Looks like I can roughly quantify lean burn's impact on fuel economy.

On my morning commute, which is ~11 miles and maybe half of it I can run lean, my most common readout is 73.3mpg. Sometimes I can manage a little higher, but I get this exact amount suspiciously frequently.

After installing an arduino to spoof the IMA signals and get the CEL to shut off, I lost lean burn. Conditions were almost ideal this morning on my way to work, it likely would have been a 75-80mpg day. I pulled in to the parking lot with 68.8mpg on the meter. So, I'm going to call it very approximately 10% in mixed driving.
Are you sure you have the most recent code for the arduino? When I had it in my car I lost lean burn until I went to the most recent code.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-26-2018)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com