Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-01-2011, 11:36 PM   #171 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: N. IL
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dragging up some thing way way back in this thread, but EGR = BAD for FE!

EGR is for NOx emissions, not for FE. It often has very little moving parts itself because airflow through it is regulated by a throttle someplace else on the engine. If you have EGR, get rid of it, if you dont DONT ADD IT.

by the way, the adjustable grille is awesome. I am going to "borrow" some ideas from that.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-01-2011, 11:40 PM   #172 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nichols735 View Post
dragging up some thing way way back in this thread, but EGR = BAD for FE!

EGR is for NOx emissions, not for FE. It often has very little moving parts itself because airflow through it is regulated by a throttle someplace else on the engine. If you have EGR, get rid of it, if you dont DONT ADD IT.

by the way, the adjustable grille is awesome. I am going to "borrow" some ideas from that.
This is a pretty strong first post... Do you have any references to back up your claims?

Edit: Clearly, you're referring only to EGR on a diesel engine, correct? If that is, in fact, the case, disregard my call for references.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 10:06 AM   #173 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nichols735 View Post
If you have EGR, get rid of it, if you dont DONT ADD IT.
NOx is far worse than a slight decrease in FE.

Have you forgotten about the acid rain, dead trees, or have you never seen them ?

Despite EGR, we still get better FE than maybe 95% of the US ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 03:58 PM   #174 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Since installing the EGR cooler last autumn I haven't noticed much of a difference in milage. The newer versions of my turbodiesel have a restriction in the intake manifold that helps suck in more EGR, and not only are they cleaner (EURO 4 and EURO 5), but also more fuel efficient (lower consumption by 0.1-0.4 l/100km). Of course, this may not be because of EGR, but in spite of it, yet it shows that it is possible to increase EGR in a diesel without sacrificing FE.
Reading how people have removed/blocked the EGR valve in their diesels, some report a subjective 20% improvement while others reported worse fuel consumption and performance.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 04:00 PM   #175 (permalink)
RRC
EcoModding Lurker
 
RRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: PL
Posts: 24

Skodillac - '97 Skoda Felicia Hatch. MPI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 41.98 mpg (US)

Toyota YS - '20 - -
Team Toyota
90 day: 59.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
(...)
You wouldn't happen to be from around Warsaw, would you?
Yup
__________________

_______


*Most of my driving is city driving
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 05:31 PM   #176 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
PW - apologies for jumping in again to ask questions - before the intake changes did you record before and after intake temps ? Do you monitor them now and if so what do you get ?

Thanks.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2011, 07:07 PM   #177 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: N. IL
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
NOx is far worse than a slight decrease in FE.

Have you forgotten about the acid rain, dead trees, or have you never seen them ?

Despite EGR, we still get better FE than maybe 95% of the US ...
Well, people sometimes forget that if you increase your mileage because of it then you total emissions per mile is lower, i.e. NET lower emissions. It all varies depends on speed/load, but your net emissions will most likey be higher w/o EGR, even with increased mileage.

back to the car in question, PIWOSLAWany update on coolant temp with the adjustable grille block?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 10:17 AM   #178 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
A friend last year had a plugged EGR valve in his Chevy V6. It dropped his mileage about 20%. Fixing it restored the mileage.

Our theory: exhaust gas is already oxygen depleted, so acts as an inert gas in the combustion event. Adding more of this inert gas means less of the active fuel-air mix in the cylinder. Basically, it makes your engine act as if it's smaller than it is. You get lower power, but also lower fuel consumption.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:57 PM   #179 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
PW - apologies for jumping in again to ask questions - before the intake changes did you record before and after intake temps ? Do you monitor them now and if so what do you get ?
My intake temperature sensor is before the turbo, so it doesn't register any change between blocked and unblocked intercooler. As for blocking the hole between radiator and intake scoop - it's too early to tell, but I doubt that I'd notice. This is because the intake duct snakes around the engine like a heat exchanger, good if it was a gasser and I wanted a WAI, but since it's a diesel I wonder about the sanity of PSA's engineers More details here: More efficient air intake (1.6HDi) - ideas.

What really increased engine and intake temperatures was the upper grille block and engine insulation.

Nichols735: Just the lower grille block doesn't effect coolant temps when driving in flat terrain - it stays at 78°C. Adding the upper grille block kept temperatures closer to 88°-92°C, with ambient temps at or below freezing.
Driving uphill brings the temps up (85°-95°C) and then I open the lower grille block.
I hardly ever hear my fan turn on (only when the A/C is on), but this is what happens when you hypermile a turbodiesel
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 05:26 PM   #180 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,747

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Flow separation!

While inspecting how dirty the car is today, I noticed a tiny detail on the rear lamp:
Can you see it? It's the thin vertical line of dust, just left of the center on the picture. Nothing fancy unless you know that this is the point at which the airflow starts to separate, that's why it's relatively clean ahead of that line. Here's another view:

So what? Well, maybe I could glue clear plastic at that point, extending a few cm to the rear. This would create a lip or minikammback with a sharp trailing edge. I'd do the same to the rounded corners of the rear bumper. Probably not worth any mpg's, but who knows?

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	rear_lamp1.jpg
Views:	677
Size:	98.7 KB
ID:	8612   Click image for larger version

Name:	rear_lamp2.jpg
Views:	655
Size:	107.0 KB
ID:	8613  
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
kompot (01-11-2012)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
grille block, kammback, peugeot, wheel skirts



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
groar's 1997 Megane Modding Thread groar EcoModding Central 95 02-12-2014 01:57 PM
The Golden Egg mod thread. Mostly minivan modding orange4boy EcoModding Central 68 12-15-2011 01:48 PM
groar's 2001 Scenic Modding Thread groar EcoModding Central 4 11-25-2008 09:22 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com