Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-29-2010, 10:10 AM   #61 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by endurance View Post
..... ABS is great on packed snow and asphalt roads, but on loose gravel and glazed ice the skill of the driver is more important than the technology in the car. ........ Once all four wheels stop turning, the computer thinks you're stopped, so ABS no longer works. You need at least one wheel turning to have ABS work. Unfortunately, most folks don't know that until after the accident.
I now recall the van would lock up at less than 15 mph. But as it was a steep hill, it got over 15 mph easily, then the ABS held me at about 15 mph so long as I let off the brakes long enough to get the wheels turning. If it slowed down too much I had to let up or go into a skid. And it was on glare ice--this was after the ice storm a few years ago that made national headlines.

With as sophisticated as cars are getting, I wonder if the more high tech systems can "learn" the amount of available traction and ease on the brake pressure instead of locking up/unlocking constantly.

__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-29-2010, 11:57 AM   #62 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 279

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 Acura RSX Type S
90 day: 38.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 Chevrolet K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
I now recall the van would lock up at less than 15 mph. But as it was a steep hill, it got over 15 mph easily, then the ABS held me at about 15 mph so long as I let off the brakes long enough to get the wheels turning. If it slowed down too much I had to let up or go into a skid. And it was on glare ice--this was after the ice storm a few years ago that made national headlines.

With as sophisticated as cars are getting, I wonder if the more high tech systems can "learn" the amount of available traction and ease on the brake pressure instead of locking up/unlocking constantly.
My experience is pretty similar; ABS works better at higher speeds. The more expensive systems have speed sensors at each wheel and when an individual wheel is turning slower, it reduces braking pressure at that wheel. As your speed approaches zero the threshold between turning and stopped gets narrower. You can only vary brake pressure so much, thus, your performance near a stop is poorer. With that said, how many of those accidents were over 15mph in the video? Probably few were over 10mph, where ABS works the worst.

In every situation where I've been on true glare ice, I've ended up having to take back control after all four wheels locked. At the same time, we're being told not to pump the brakes and let the ABS do its job. That's all well and good if it does, but I'd really encourage everyone to get out and play in the snow in a nice, big empty parking lot and learn what the abilities and limitations are and how to get the best performance out of your brakes. I was an FTO with a small sheriffs office about 20 years ago and I would always head to the ski area parking lots at night just to run the new officers through their paces on packed snow and ice. Everyone sucks the first time they go into a skid, but after only a handful of times, your reflexes develop and you start making more precise adjustments to your steering and braking.

Far better to practice with no one around than to hit your first icy road of the year with wall to wall commuters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2010, 12:51 PM   #63 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
I have used a floored truck to claw my way out, but the ice was very thin and it chewed through the ice to the dirt underneath, so not typical. Chains for the win on ice. may have to go slow but chains on a low fwd car, will beat no chains on anything else short of a tracked vehicle.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2010, 10:13 PM   #64 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
t vago - They assume the brakes are the only way to slow down, and that's what I should be using.

IsaacCarlton - I wish my brakes were that strong!

As far as ABS, my system is 3 channel (pulses fronts separately, rear as one due to only one rear brake line). It works pretty well, and I've never locked a tire at slow speeds. Even at 5mph in snow/slush, if I'm braking and one tire goes over an icy spot, I'll get 1 or 2 pulses from the ABS and that's it. Mind you, I rarely kick the ABS due to careful braking, but there are times where it still happens (misjudged traction or slick spots).

Bestclimb - In deep snow where there's a lot of rolling resistance and not enough traction, such as me getting started from a stop in 15" of unplowed snow, sometimes liberal use of the skinny pedal is the only way to do it. Deep snow is a lot like sand and/or mud in that respect.
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2010, 11:12 AM   #65 (permalink)
eco....something or other
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colfax, WI
Posts: 719

wood hauler - '91 Ford F-250
Team Pontiac
90 day: 18.97 mpg (US)

Rav - '06 Toyota Rav4 Base
90 day: 26.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 61 Times in 46 Posts
QUOTE: Liberal use of the skinny pedal......


I like that...
__________________



1991 F-250:
4.9L, Mazda 5 speed, 4.10 10.25" rear
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:09 AM   #66 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
I think the real cool one is traction control. Only drove one car with traction control, and when I got stuck trying to climb a steep dirt driveway, I just gave it gentle throttle til the car sorted how to climb the hill, which it eventually did.
Traction control has it's limits too. My old Vette had traction control and I absolutely couldn't get up a snowy hill with it, just too slippery (3" of snow and 285/40ZR17 high performance tires area bad combo). Turned it off, and I was able to rock it to get it started and then slip and slide my way up the hill.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:32 AM   #67 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Traction control has it's limits too. My old Vette had traction control and I absolutely couldn't get up a snowy hill with it, just too slippery (3" of snow and 285/40ZR17 high performance tires area bad combo). Turned it off, and I was able to rock it to get it started and then slip and slide my way up the hill.
Had similar issues with a saturn. the traction control nutered engine power on snow, a little slip allows the tires to chew their way through the snow. Frankly if I can't tell my tires are slipping and deal with it I have no business driving.
__________________

Learn from the mistakes of others, that way when you mess up you can do so in new and interesting ways.

One mile of road will take you one mile, one mile of runway can take you around the world.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 01:35 AM   #68 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by comptiger5000 View Post
I agree that drivers rely too much on the car's fancy gadgets, and don't actually know how to drive. My Jeep has ABS, but it rarely kicks in, as I typically threshold brake, and stay off the brakes when turning in snow/ice. If/when it does kick more than once or on multiple wheels, that is a signal to ease up on the brakes a little.

It has no traction control, etc. Rear diff is limited slip, front is open. My friends all get freaked out at me driving around in a couple inches of snow and/or slush in 2wd, and that I'm not terrified when it slides a bit around a slushy corner. There are some corners where I'll pop it in 2wd and gas it very lightly to make the rear end slide a bit, then pull it back into 4wd as I clear the corner, as it's far easier to get through the corner that way at 5-10 mph than by crawling 2mph to make the tight, uphill turn and risk getting stuck in deep, icy slush from too little momentum.

People also find it strange that I downshift to slow down, particularly in snow and ice, and will hold a lower gear in the snow. In bad snow, I've crawled down a couple of steep hills in 4lo, 2nd gear to keep my speed down to 5-6 mph without the brakes.

I was taught how to drive in snow the right way: in a big, empty parking lot. I'm only 18, but the extra crap (traction control, stability control) is just annoying IMO, and impedes the driver's ability to actually drive the vehicle.
On the rare occasion I'm in a 4wd, I always drive in 2wd until I get to a point where I can't get further in 2wd and then use 4wd to get unstuck, then put it back in 2wd and continue on. Relying on 4wd all the time tends to get you into a situation that is REALLY bad.

I've only owned 2wd vehicles since I don't go offroading and I have only once been in a situation where I needed 4wd on a regularly maintained road. And I've been in some nasty situations. Good tires will get you anywhere you need to go.

You seem to be a far better driver than most kids your age. Just remember you always have more to learn, so don't get too cocky out there.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2011, 10:23 AM   #69 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
comptiger5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 544

RaceJeep - '98 Jeep Grand Cherokee (ZJ) 5.9 Limited
90 day: 13.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 23 Posts
Thanks! I have been told by quite a few people about the 4wd only when needed trick, which definitely works. "2wd gets you stuck, 4wd gets you stuck worse".

I think part of what helped, particularly as far as winter driving, was that when I was learning to drive, my dad made me push various vehicles to their limits, including plenty of time spent in parking lots. Plus, it helps that the Jeep has fairly balanced (and very predictable) handling (mild understeer, easily countered with throttle in either 2wd or 4wd).
__________________
Call me crazy, but I actually try for mpg with this Jeep:



Typical driving: Back in Rochester for school, driving is 60 - 70% city
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2011, 03:00 PM   #70 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
More: "why didn't someone go to the top of the hill to warn them" icy roads mayhem...


__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My New 4cyl Compact Doesn't Get Good Mileage Stone Axe Introductions 13 02-08-2013 12:06 PM
EcoModding for Beginners: Getting great gas mileage. SVOboy EcoModding Central 55 08-20-2012 11:34 PM
Another reason winter mileage bites: millions of snow tires without wheel covers MetroMPG Aerodynamics 18 05-08-2010 12:19 PM
In a world where Jeeps get horrible gas mileage.... EcoJeeper Introductions 16 03-26-2009 12:09 PM
mileage is mileage, right? (question about accuracy of small fill) Chris D. General Efficiency Discussion 16 10-21-2008 07:59 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com