04-09-2019, 09:14 PM
|
#1051 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
It does. But Tesla's redesign has always been the creation of an entire new platform. I doubt they have a different development team for each different platform. Roadster, S, X, 3, new Roadster... time for new S and new X before the polish wears off the 3.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 10:50 PM
|
#1052 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
It does. But Tesla's redesign has always been the creation of an entire new platform. I doubt they have a different development team for each different platform. Roadster, S, X, 3, new Roadster... time for new S and new X before the polish wears off the 3.
|
Tesla has never done a model refresh or redesign. They are still building out their base offerings.
Per industry standards the S should have been redesigned in 2017 and the X is due in 2020. It would make a whole lot of sense to redesign them together and put them on the same platform. They should be sharing way more part content.
That said with the New Roadster, Y, and Semi I doubt they have the resources to release a new S and X in the next few years.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 03:05 AM
|
#1053 (permalink)
|
Master EcoWalker
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 4,000
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
The Y is a 3 for the most part. The Semi is a completely new development away from the car business (though it does use Model 3 motors and probably electronics and cells). The Roadster could well share a platform with the new S and X.
I don't see too much complexity in that.
Besides, the industry typically develops and releases several models per year, why could Tesla not do so? Tesla grows...
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gigameter or 0.13 Megamile.
For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 09:15 AM
|
#1054 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil
The Y is a 3 for the most part. The Semi is a completely new development away from the car business (though it does use Model 3 motors and probably electronics and cells). The Roadster could well share a platform with the new S and X.
I don't see too much complexity in that.
Besides, the industry typically develops and releases several models per year, why could Tesla not do so? Tesla grows...
|
Every new model takes time and money. Every engineer working an the Semi is an engineer not working on a new S. Every dollar spent on a halo Roadster is a dollar not spent on the bread and butter Model S.
Yes, Tesla could be run like a normal car company if it had a CEO that knew how to make cars and didn’t have to worry about cash flow. It takes money to grow and Tesla doesn’t have money.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 01:18 PM
|
#1055 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
Tesla is not doing things like most other car makers. They use the actual year a car is manufactured - for its model year. They have improved / fixed things as needed; not waiting for the "next model year".
It is unlikely that they will make wholesale changes - making a design change for the sake of change - is exactly what they WON'T do.
I hope that other car makers will follow the principles that Tesla has. Aerodynamics should drive the design - not stylists.
Who will build a car as efficient as the EV1? We need better cars; not just different ones.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 01:22 PM
|
#1056 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
I do like that Tesla challenges many of the traditional ways of doing things, from direct sales, to cutting out haggling/commission, mobile repair, elimination of most sales kiosks (online ordering), etc, etc.
Some of the ideas are sure to be a flop, but you don't improve something if you're not trying, failing, and adjusting.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 01:31 PM
|
#1057 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
They use the actual year a car is manufactured - for its model year.
|
Interesting! Didn't know that.
So, not like the '2015' Micra that went on sale in Canada in April 2014?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-10-2019, 02:21 PM
|
#1058 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
I am sure there are many improvements to the way corporations have made cars for a hundred years. I absolutely do not believe in doing anything just because everybody else does it that way. However, that still seems like a good place to start, just ask yourself at every step "Is there a more effective way?"
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 02:49 PM
|
#1059 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,819
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,480 Times in 3,445 Posts
|
Musk found this out firsthand when he admitted that he had over-automated some things that still are best done by manual labor. Creative solutions aren't necessarily better, and usually worse.
This underlines the importance of the conservative vs liberal balance. The conservative approach gets things done the way we already know how to get things done. Liberal ideas propose better ways to do things, or adapt to changing circumstances. Most new ideas are terrible and fail, but usually that's what is necessary to figure out what works best. Once a new way is proved to be best, it's adopted by the conservatives and becomes THE way to do things... until something better comes along.
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 05:58 PM
|
#1060 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,734
Thanks: 8,157
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
They use the actual year a car is manufactured - for its model year.
|
Interesting! Didn't know that.
|
There was a manufacturer in the 1930s that adopted that principle, took more than a decade to introduce a new model, and started with a marketing scheme (literally) to collect stamps in a booklet toward ownership.
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
|
|
|
|