10-24-2009, 09:29 PM
|
#331 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf
And in the process missing the real point, which is that the Insight was never intended to turn a profit.
|
You have a firm grasp of the obvious.
Nobody builds a cheap aluminum car because its impossible to turn a profit.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-24-2009, 09:47 PM
|
#332 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 01:48 AM
|
#333 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
Dude... who cares. I was talking about the first gen INSIGHT. The insight and the NSX shared the same assembly line and manufacturing process. I was making a point of the fact that you can't turn a profit selling aluminum cars for $20k. Same story with the Audi A1 from a few years back. Brilliant on paper but it doesn't make financial sense.
|
If you weren't talking about the NSX not being able to turn a profit, then why did you mention the fact that it wasn't able to turn a profit? Hm... that makes sense.
__________________
"żʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 03:21 AM
|
#334 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Frank -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
|
I don't think it's impossible to turn a profit using aluminum, but it doesn't seem right to me to use an NEV in comparison with a regular automobile. It's an African vs European Swallow thing, I think.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 03:56 AM
|
#335 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
It's the first thing that came to mind.
How bout the Corvette Z06? Moneymaker?
http://dana.mediaroom.com/file.php/1...na_article.pdf
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-25-2009, 04:05 AM
|
#336 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Frank -
That's what I'm talkin' about.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 01:19 PM
|
#337 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
You have a firm grasp of the obvious.
|
Not so obvious. The point is that it's senseless to hold the Insight up as an example to show that it's impossible to turn a profit on aluminum-bodied cars, because it was never intended to be profitable.
Quote:
Nobody builds a cheap aluminum car because its impossible to turn a profit.
|
Something I have problems understanding, at a pretty fundamental level, because by that same logic beer cans should still be made out of steel :-)
The real lesson here is that if you want to turn a profit building cars, then you have to either build lots of them, or sell each one at a high price. If you introduce a new technology, whether it's aluminum bodies or plug-in hybrid powertrains, then you have to either charge high prices for the first ones (Volt, NSX, Tesla), or eat a big chunk of R&D costs for the first few years (Insight, Prius).
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 05:42 PM
|
#338 (permalink)
|
Chevy and CB Radio Lover
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 302
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Well, I must admit, it now appears GM is going full speed forward with building The Volt. The way they were talking I had some doubts, thus this thread.... Now I am hearing from the workers strong rumors of GM shifting jobs around and getting ready to re-tool for The Volt etc... Some jobs from Pontiac Mi are said to be transferred to a plant in Flint, Mi where my father used to work. Sad to say though, that there not talking about A LOT of jobs, a hundred or two here, a hundred or two there, nothing that will put a dent in the Michigan economy where many of these jobs will be. I also heard something about some Temp workers being planed for- that's something the OLD GM would of never done because the UAW would of stood against it. But now many new changes are in effect.
I still wonder how the news of GM selling a car at a loss will resonate with the taxpayers of US and Canada. I'm not sure the average person can grasp the reasoning of selling a car at a loss for a couple years before making a profit on it.
__________________
Support American
Workers!
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 05:58 PM
|
#339 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 850
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
I Can easily grasp the idea of selling anything at a loss... initially. If this car could eventually turn a profit then that might make sense. But I don't think it can. Realistically this car has to compete with BMW, Merc, Acura, Lexus, Infinity and a few other select offerings in teh luxury car category.
For the money people who shell out 40K for a car are interested typically in a few different things. Mostly they are interested in what they call sports cars. Unfortunately these cars carry none of the sport aspect and adopt the luxury out of an SUV and maintain the weight of a car. It is sporty in the sense compared to a tanker, but its not really that sporty when compared to purpose built sport cars(WRX, EVO, etc..) So to hook buyers in that tax bracket its going to have to offer similar styling and compete against the big name luxury badges.
The other group of individuals who spend upwards of 35K for a car are people interested in something fast. I am not even going to explain this point.
I really don't see too many individuals cashing in their SUVs and getting a volt. I don't see ANY trading in a BMW, Merc, Lexus, or Acura and getting a Chevy. I also don't see very many new-comers to the luxury market being terribly interested in the Volt. Lastly, the Volt is outside the price range of most hybrid buyers.
|
|
|
10-25-2009, 06:07 PM
|
#340 (permalink)
|
Chevy and CB Radio Lover
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: East Kentucky
Posts: 302
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunchosen
I Can easily grasp the idea of selling anything at a loss... initially. If this car could eventually turn a profit then that might make sense. But I don't think it can. Realistically this car has to compete with BMW, Merc, Acura, Lexus, Infinity and a few other select offerings in teh luxury car category.
For the money people who shell out 40K for a car are interested typically in a few different things. Mostly they are interested in what they call sports cars. Unfortunately these cars carry none of the sport aspect and adopt the luxury out of an SUV and maintain the weight of a car. It is sporty in the sense compared to a tanker, but its not really that sporty when compared to purpose built sport cars(WRX, EVO, etc..) So to hook buyers in that tax bracket its going to have to offer similar styling and compete against the big name luxury badges.
The other group of individuals who spend upwards of 35K for a car are people interested in something fast. I am not even going to explain this point.
I really don't see too many individuals cashing in their SUVs and getting a volt. I don't see ANY trading in a BMW, Merc, Lexus, or Acura and getting a Chevy. I also don't see very many new-comers to the luxury market being terribly interested in the Volt. Lastly, the Volt is outside the price range of most hybrid buyers.
|
Please do not forget Cadillac owners as well.
__________________
Support American
Workers!
|
|
|
|