12-03-2010, 03:15 PM
|
#471 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
If you consider CO2 then it is fairly directly proportional to mileage. The VX had lower C02 than almost every car made today, not considering the aero improvements that would drop the levels significantly lower.
NOX might be higher if measured as a percentage of exhaust without regards to the volume of the exhaust, but the amount would be much closer if you account for the higher mileage due to better aero.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-03-2010, 06:38 PM
|
#472 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
But its my understanding that the VX had to have its oxygen sensor modified for use in California because it could not pass emissions due to the excess pollution while in lean burn. If this car is spending a large portion of time in lean-burn, I have my doubts about how clean that it is.
Where is the point that you break even - is a pre LEV car getting 75 mpg as clean as an SULEV that gets 55 ?
|
|
|
12-03-2010, 08:17 PM
|
#473 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Lean burn was not employed on California versions of the VX. Sacrifice some NOX for much more CO2.
MPG about 6 less than Fed versions.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 12:33 PM
|
#474 (permalink)
|
Wannabe greenie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
From one of the linkback posts:
Quote:
All i can say is , wow, pause, fail (Epic fail), omg, and this is why i have a neon an not a honda
|
95 miles per gallon is an epic fail? Idiots.
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 12:54 PM
|
#475 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
Yep, 95 mpg is nothing to laugh at.
__________________
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 12:58 PM
|
#476 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,528
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,977 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
I sometimes like reading the discussions at the linkback forums.
What surprises me is, among the expected ridicule, there are more than a few individuals in the traditional "performance" community who express respect for basjoos' initiative & results. They see his goals as a "different kind of performance", no less valid than their performance aims.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2010, 01:13 PM
|
#477 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 155
Thanks: 23
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clev
From one of the linkback posts:
95 miles per gallon is an epic fail? Idiots.
|
If mike added an aftermarket spoiler to it, they'd probably like it. They can keep their american-rice rides.
__________________
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 05:05 PM
|
#478 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
When I am talking with a "performance" car enthusiast, I tell them my car is patterned after a Bonneville salt flats land speed car and the all of the mods on my car are those used on the salt flats speedsters to reduce aero drag. That I did the mods for their great improvement to the high speed performance of my car and that the mileage improvement is just a fringe benefit of the mods. That just like their wet dream is a street legal NASCAR or Rally car, my wet dream is a street legal Bonneville land speed car.
Of course, when I am talking with a "greenie", I tell them I did it for the mileage improvement and that the high speed performance improvement is just a fringe benefit. Its just two sides of the same coin.
Last edited by basjoos; 12-15-2010 at 05:12 PM..
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to basjoos For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-15-2010, 05:52 PM
|
#479 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin
Posts: 155
Thanks: 23
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by basjoos
When I am talking with a "performance" car enthusiast, I tell them my car is patterned after a Bonneville salt flats land speed car and the all of the mods on my car are those used on the salt flats speedsters to reduce aero drag. That I did the mods for their great improvement to the high speed performance of my car and that the mileage improvement is just a fringe benefit of the mods. That just like their wet dream is a street legal NASCAR or Rally car, my wet dream is a street legal Bonneville land speed car.
Of course, when I am talking with a "greenie", I tell them I did it for the mileage improvement and that the high speed performance improvement is just a fringe benefit. Its just two sides of the same coin.
|
I just um.... want to throw this out there.... I get excited when I see stuff like the Aptera, but not that excited lol
__________________
|
|
|
12-15-2010, 06:52 PM
|
#480 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 26
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Agreed, 2003protege. I'm looking forward to seeing the Aptera in production. Only thing is I'm in TX and they will not sell here for a while. They use all the mods basjoos used and more. Maybe they copied him! Yes?
|
|
|
|