The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Climate gate 1 and 2.
Then there was climate gate 3 but that was down graded to gross scientific misconduct.
Any belivers who haven't heard of any of these chose to bury their heads in the sand and pretend everything is perfect.
Even if you ignore the fraud there is the funding bias, where it's been proven by the sugar industry of all places that scientific studies are more likely to end with favorable results to the entity that supplied the funding.

Your conspiracy theory is bunk.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Your conspiracy theory is bunk.

Yeah, from my quick reading it doesn't sound like there's much there.

An email from a scientist saying ""The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t", out of context too.

I'm sure scientists can be too miopic for varying reasons including the ones I've mentioned already, but I don't see evidence for gross misrepresentation.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by litesong

"don'T rump", making excuses for white nationalists who killed a woman in Charlottesville, said there were good people on both sides.....along with his other 10,000 plus lies.
P.S. update: A news-person just now, numbered the lies of "don'T rump", in excess of 12,000.

Do you know how to tell if a politician is lying? See if their lips are moving.

PS. Those "news" people are trying desperately to match the number of lies. Faith in the news media is misplaced. Political extremists on both sides at best take things out of context and attribute false motive to people, and at worst outright lie and sensationalize. Which news person said that Trump is calling for the extermination of latinos?

Anyhow, I thought I'd point out that the difference between you and aerohead is that you're disagreeable and make no attempt at having a reasonable discussion, while aerohead disagrees without being (overtly) disagreeable and attempts at a dialogue. Ad-hominems and guilt by association tactics don't convey goodwill or anything of substantive value.

[litesong]

Originally Posted by litesong

"don'T rump", making excuses for white nationalists who killed a woman in Charlottesville, said there were good people on both sides.....along with his other 10,000 plus lies.
P.S. update: A news-person just now, numbered the lies of "don'T rump", in excess of 12,000.

Originally Posted by redpoint5

Do you know how to tell if a politician is lying? See if their lips are moving.
PS. Those "news" people are trying desperately to match the number of lies ...... Political extremists on both sides.....
I thought I'd point out that the difference between you and aerohead is......

redpoint makes all the racist, sexist, xenophobic, bought-by-putin re-pubic-lick-un "don'T rump" support points. Its to side-step(yes, redpoint doesn't mention Charlottesville) the knowledge that "don'T rump" admits continuously that he has withdrawn from humanity. Raised by a KKK-supporter father (maybe a white-hatter), "don'T rump" learned well at his daddy's feet.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

You will be affected by our climate crisis; along with everybody else.

No I wont.
The people who live below sea level will be effected most.
I took the high ground, have a well and growing my own food and fuel.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Your conspiracy theory is bunk.

Oh so funding bias doesn't exist because you say so. Sure.

[freebeard]

redpoint litesong makes all the racist, sexist, xenophobic, bought-by-putin re-pubic-lick-un "don'T rump" support points.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others. For example, a person who is habitually intolerant may constantly accuse other people of being intolerant. It incorporates blame shifting.

[litesong]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Oh so funding bias doesn't exist because you say so. Sure.

Of course, there is funding bias. Exxon, Koch & other oil monies are given to Sanger, Soon, Stossel, Heartless, AEI, etc.

[litesong]

freebeard fluffed: "litesong makes all the racist, sexist, xenophobic, bought-by-putin re-pubic-lick-un "don'T rump" support points".
//////
freebeard thought that redpoint's plagiarism was good. So freebeard really wound up ITS plagiarist curveball.

[redpoint5]

Originally Posted by litesong

Of course, there is funding bias. Exxon, Koch & other oil monies are given to Sanger, Soon, Stossel, Heartless, AEI, etc.

So you agree that the principle of funding bias applies equally regardless of political affiliation, or is this a magical 1-way phenomenon?

Originally Posted by litesong

freebeard fluffed: "litesong makes all the racist, sexist, xenophobic, bought-by-putin re-pubic-lick-un "don'T rump" support points".
//////
freebeard thought that redpoint's plagiarism was good. So freebeard really wound up ITS plagiarist curveball.

I don't know what plagiarism you're attributing to me (along with any of the other accusations) because you don't quote them for reference to back your claims.

That said, 99.999% of all thoughts are plagiarized. Did you invent the language you're using, or did you plagiarize them from others? I'll also point out that much of what you're saying, and especially the way in which you're saying it appears to come from a particular playbook. Perhaps you wrote that playbook and everyone else is plagiarizing? Equally despicable either way.