Cosmic Catastrophe

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

During ex-President Obama's reelection campaign, I read the transcripts rather than watch the speeches live, because I'd read about DDG/?q=obama+mass+hypnosis+in+speeches

There are things which might be said about such things, although I'm certain we ought not attempt it. It would violate all the rules.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by aerohead

A provocative comment.
Await your facts.

Fact if there's a 1 ohm and a 10 ohm path for current to flow. If current follows the path of least resistance than the 10 ohm path would have no current flow. This is wrong and easy to test.

A corrected ohms law would say something to the effect of "current flow is proportional to resistance".

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by aerohead

I still don't know what your asking.
The S-O video shared by oilpan4 covered six topics in its brief presentation.
I found zero value in all six mentioned.
That's what I intended to convey.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 'self-realization' material has to do with how psychologists explain hatred for science behavior, something I 'smell' here at the Lounge routinely.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As to Scott Adams, he's no one I'd ever rely upon to inform how I think about things.
I remain mystified as to why, when the internet allows us all direct access to the 'horse's mouth', people still choose 'filters' to delegate their critical thinking to.

Your loss.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Fact if there's a 1 ohm and a 10 ohm path for current to flow. If current follows the path of least resistance than the 10 ohm path would have no current flow. This is wrong and easy to test.

A corrected ohms law would say something to the effect of "current flow is proportional to resistance".

Okay, so let's say it's a DC circuit, and the positive source shares a parallel trace two both resistive loads.
You close a switch, and current flows to both loads, since both see the same potential to ground.
I'm guessing that if you have inline ammeters at each load, that the 1-ohm load will see ten times the amount of amperage flowing to ground, compared to the 10-ohm load?
Is that the gist of where you were going?

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

"Does it fall back"?
Nope. And it wasn't even that big of a flare that blasted it away. Almost like the sun spots are cooler than normal, as if something is changing.

All I'm seeing is a bolometric still image of a structure erupting. It's not a video, where I can watch the 'conclusion' to the activity.
Can you direct me to some other resource from that event, that you had access to, which illustrated 'ejection.'
We're in Solar Cycle - 25, which peaks at maximum next year.
Solar Cycle -24's Solar Maximum, in 2014, was the weakest ever recorded since 1754.
While sunspots block 'visible' spectra, they do not block ultraviolet. And it's a fact that, the moats around the sunspots are brighter than the surface of the Sun, along with faculae and plages, which together determine Total Solar Irradiance.
Vacuum UV, Short Wave UV, Middle Wave UV, Long Wave UV, along with all the visible spectra must be combined for the quantitative evaluation.

[freebeard]

I'm guessing that if you have inline ammeters at each load, that the 1-ohm load will see then times the amount of amps flowing to ground, compared to the 10-ohm load?

Close. Parsing for logical consistency, not ten times because the total load is eleven ohms. The reciprocal of 9/10, or 1.something.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Your loss.

Perhaps.
Are you going to support your x-ray 'wrongness' assertion?
Are you going to support your sunspot 'wrongness' assertion?
I never saw more than a partial page about the 'superconductivity' argument, would you like to contribute to that one?

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Close. Parsing for logical consistency, not ten times because the total load is eleven ohms. The reciprocal of 9/10, or 1.something.

I'll have to crack open the old textbook. The downside of the course I took was that it did not include any lab, where we could have built the circuits we were analyzing only mathematically. Sucks.

[freebeard]

My error: the reciprocal of 10/11ths.

The Earth's magnetosphere moderates Space Weather, but can't and doesn't totally insulate it. Cascades of lower frequency [radiation/particles?].

The Sun is a black ball with electric fields dancing on it's surface. Powered by a gradient that streatches to the Oort Cloud.

[aerohead]

I looked at Ohm's Law online and it was as I remembered ( I = V/R )
* With a 12- volt, direct-current (12-VDC) power source
* Parallel circuit with, a 1-Ohm resister and 10-Ohm resister load ( R-1 & R-10 )
*The lesser resistance load will see 10X the amount of Amps (current ), 12-Amps vs 1.2-Amps.
* It's 'proportional' just as oilpan4 spoke of.