03-26-2020, 12:47 PM
|
#341 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,425
Thanks: 540
Thanked 1,205 Times in 1,063 Posts
|
I want my chicken ina pot, flying car, and instant voting electronic democratic gummint I was promised.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-26-2020, 12:51 PM
|
#342 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Any bill that cannot fit onto a single 8.5"x11" page 12pt font should go directly into the garbage. Politicians should have to take a multiple choice test on the contents of the bill, and if they get less than 70% they don't get to vote and their pay gets reduced.
|
Only if you want the law completely determined by the Bureaucracy and courts. People already complain that too much the details of our laws are written by "unelected bureaucrats" instead of Congress.
How does Congress regulate allowed air pollution in 1 page?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-26-2020, 01:24 PM
|
#343 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Any bill that cannot fit onto a single 8.5"x11" page...
|
Any bill can already be summed up in a sound bite. Do you really want those to be our laws?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-26-2020, 01:25 PM
|
#344 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,811
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,479 Times in 3,444 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
Only if you want the law completely determined by the Bureaucracy and courts. People already complain that too much the details of our laws are written by "unelected bureaucrats" instead of Congress.
How does Congress regulate allowed air pollution in 1 page?
|
Probably 10x more effectively than how we're addressing air pollution now.
The federal government would establish maximum thresholds from top health professionals, and then declare that states shall maintain air quality below that threshold or face x outcome. Seems it would fit on half a page... How to achieve the standards would be up to state and local government to determine how best to achieve those standards.
You'd have a bill for each type of pollutant of concern. If revised standards need to be implemented, the new bill either amends the previous one, or replaces it entirely.
That reminds me of how ineffective my previous boss was because he would list a very precise set of steps to take and leave out the objective. Customers would call back asking why things went terribly, and I'd just have to say I wasn't informed of the objective, and would have done differently had I known.
The federal government needs to be as broad and general as possible, which is why laws should fit on an 8.5"x11" page easily. Failure to do so indicates they are overreaching and creating inefficiency. Let the people near to the problem solve it.
Last edited by redpoint5; 03-26-2020 at 02:00 PM..
|
|
|
03-26-2020, 01:45 PM
|
#345 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,601
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,147 Times in 1,454 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck
.
NPR needs to be defunded... Period...
>
|
Yeah, we wouldn't want rural communities having access to radio and TV
About 10% of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s budget comes from the government. 5 members of the board of directors including the chairman have been appointed by Trump, 3 by Obama, 1 seat is currently empty.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-26-2020, 01:54 PM
|
#346 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
You'd have a bill for each type of pollutant of concern. If revised standards need to be implemented, you the new bill either amends the previous one, or replaces it entirely.
|
So instead of one 1300 page bill, you want 1300 one page bills? And then have each state implement them randomly?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-26-2020, 02:15 PM
|
#347 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,811
Thanks: 4,327
Thanked 4,479 Times in 3,444 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
So instead of one 1300 page bill, you want 1300 one page bills? And then have each state implement them randomly?
|
NOx maximum threshold is x concentration
Exceeding x threshold by y amount for z duration results in p punishment...
How does Montana deal with that... they don't have to.
How does LA deal with that; is up to them to balance their needs and capabilities to achieve the standard. Of course, it's a maximum threshold so local regulation may be more stringent already.
The beauty is that all relevant federal law for NOx limits are self-contained. No thumbing through a 1300 page law to see what relevant part is there.
I'm revising my idea to say that a change always supersedes the previous document. We don't want a document that has to cross-reference a bunch of other documents.
|
|
|
03-26-2020, 02:32 PM
|
#348 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
|
I would like to see candidates raising money for charities, with television ads also raising money for charity.
I sure hope they wouldn't say "No! Don't donate money to the homeless [rival's charity], donate to cancer patients! [their charity]"
I would be inclined to vote for someone that raised $100,000,000 for people in need.
Then there is the option of publicly-funded campaigns. There were sixteen republicans running in 2016 and dozens of democrats running this time.
How many would enter if they didn't need to raise money?
I might consider it if they limited it to one ad per candidate per hour.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
|
|
|
03-26-2020, 09:08 PM
|
#349 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
US now leads the world in number of COVFEFE virus cases.
I don't suppose all that early waffling and diddling around had anything to do with it.
USA! USA! We're #1!
|
|
|
03-26-2020, 09:10 PM
|
#350 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
No, we have the most cases because we're the greatest country!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
|