Cosmic Catastrophe

[redneck]

Originally Posted by Piotrsko

Note that is is gang attacks on non-adult gorillas, probably ambush style. Chimps are noted terrorism fanciers, they are neurotic in personality with tendencies towards bullying..

Why the €&%\\ do I know this????

We share between 94 and 99 percent of the same genes, depending on the study.



We are them...

They are us...





>

.

[freebeard]

Originally Posted by myself

Now where did they learn that?

There's an old saying monkey, see monkey do. We don't set a good example. But chimps are evil, they will eat their caretaker's face.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

You originally said electromagnetic spectrum.
And no sun x-rays, solar ions, deep space particles have not been factored in to clumsy failed climate models.

1) Solar physicists continuously monitor the entire electromagnetic spectrum:
* absolute radiometry
* ephemereal active regions
* faculae/ moats/ plage fields
* infrared luminosity
* magnetohydrodynamics
* visible luminosity
* ultraviolet luminosity
* radio activity
* X-ray flux
* Gamma-ray flux
* Heliospheric magnetic field flux
* neutrinos
* photospheric latitudinal rotation
* plasma
* sunspots
* Alfve'n waves
* Parker spirals
* solar wind
* whistler-type waves
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* I've read of 60- terrestrial atoms which exist as un-bounded atomic nuclei, electrons, and protons in the Sun's plasma, solar wind, flares, and CMEs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Most intersteller/ intergalactic particles ( cosmic 'rays' ) are stopped dead, 100- Astronomical Units from the Sun, at the Heliopause. Neutral particles are immune, and stream right into the solar system. Neutrinos blow right through us.
* The cosmic 'rays' which get to us, react in the upper atmosphere, while down below ( at 8-miles ), we experience mainly secondary particles created up in the thermosphere ( 350-405-miles up )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the literature, I'm given to understand that, climate, general circulation models, are primarily concerned with visible and ultraviolet light.
Visible light, albedo, and the 'parasol-effect' go hand in hand as far as directly-reflected radiation to space.
Ultraviolet radiation, once it 'touches' Earth, is converted to long-wave, infrared radiation, which cannot escape though greenhouse gases and back into space. The greenhouse effect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other branches of solar physics concern themselves with space weather: Carrington events, planet sterilizing flares, and Coronal Mass Ejections, etc..

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Especially right now with the [magnetic] shields down.


A flat statement with hyperlinked source?

The World Data Center/ UK Particle Physics & Astronomy Research Council, UK, published that even during the Maunder Minimum, the Sun continued to produce a weak and cyclic magnetic field.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yu. A. Mytsyk and Victor A. Loisha, Dneproppetsrovsk University, Tomsk, Siberia, USSR, published data from Russia, Ukraine, Polish, Armenian, German, and English sources, indicating up to 217 grand aurora during the 70-years of the Maunder Minimum; averaging around 2.8- aurora / year, same as for 1989.
And there's no evidence that life on Earth was ever remarkably impacted by the event.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by aerohead

1) Solar physicists continuously monitor the entire electromagnetic spectrum:
* absolute radiometry
* ephemereal active regions
* faculae/ moats/ plage fields
* infrared luminosity
* magnetohydrodynamics
* visible luminosity
* ultraviolet luminosity
* radio activity
* X-ray flux
* Gamma-ray flux
* Heliospheric magnetic field flux
* neutrinos
* photospheric latitudinal rotation
* plasma
* sunspots
* Alfve'n waves
* Parker spirals
* solar wind
* whistler-type waves
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* I've read of 60- terrestrial atoms which exist as un-bounded atomic nuclei, electrons, and protons in the Sun's plasma, solar wind, flares, and CMEs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Most intersteller/ intergalactic particles ( cosmic 'rays' ) are stopped dead, 100- Astronomical Units from the Sun, at the Heliopause. Neutral particles are immune, and stream right into the solar system. Neutrinos blow right through us.
* The cosmic 'rays' which get to us, react in the upper atmosphere, while down below ( at 8-miles ), we experience mainly secondary particles created up in the thermosphere ( 350-405-miles up )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the literature, I'm given to understand that, climate, general circulation models, are primarily concerned with visible and ultraviolet light.
Visible light, albedo, and the 'parasol-effect' go hand in hand as far as directly-reflected radiation to space.
Ultraviolet radiation, once it 'touches' Earth, is converted to long-wave, infrared radiation, which cannot escape though greenhouse gases and back into space. The greenhouse effect.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other branches of solar physics concern themselves with space weather: Carrington events, planet sterilizing flares, and Coronal Mass Ejections, etc..

And it all gets ignored by the "climate scientists". They still use the known debunked solar irradiance study from 1996, you know the one that's been deleted off university online libraries on account of it being debunked and retraced.
If all cosmic rays are stopped 100 au out what is the "oh my god particle"?

[freebeard]

From the literature, I'm given to understand that, climate, general circulation models, are primarily concerned with visible and ultraviolet light.
....
Other branches of solar physics concern themselves with space weather: Carrington events, planet sterilizing flares, and Coronal Mass Ejections, etc..

It's all one thing. Science and philosophy used to be one thing as well.

Video on 2021 IPCC Report: https://youtu.be/BOSewUsjz_k

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

And it all gets ignored by the "climate scientists". They still use the known debunked solar irradiance study from 1996, you know the one that's been deleted off university online libraries on account of it being debunked and retraced.
If all cosmic rays are stopped 100 au out what is the "oh my god particle"?

I have no knowledge of what climate scientists ignore.
I've no knowledge that any data used in the general circulation models has been debunked.
If you'll re-read my comment, I provided two cosmic particles which routinely pass through the Heliopause and on to Earth's geomagnetic field.
I have no idea what an 'oh my god particle' is.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

It's all one thing. Science and philosophy used to be one thing as well.

Video on 2021 IPCC Report: https://youtu.be/BOSewUsjz_k

I differ with you on that one.
'Climate' happens within 8-miles of sea-level. Anything not 'coupled' to the troposphere ( and I'm not saying that there aren't things ) would generally be of no interest to a climatologist.

[oil pan 4]

Originally Posted by aerohead

I have no knowledge of what climate scientists ignore.
I've no knowledge that any data used in the general circulation models has been debunked.
If you'll re-read my comment, I provided two cosmic particles which routinely pass through the Heliopause and on to Earth's geomagnetic field.
I have no idea what an 'oh my god particle' is.

No one cares about neutrinos.
Any climate report out there has a list of papers, studies and reports used. For the 2021 report they cite a solar forcing as a one of their sources but don't actually use it anywhere in the report. So now we know they are aware of and willfully ignore the science that interferes with their predetermined outcome.
The "oh my god particle" has its own Wikipedia page.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

It's all one thing. Science and philosophy used to be one thing as well.

Video on 2021 IPCC Report: https://youtu.be/BOSewUsjz_k

Particle forcing would be sulfate aerosols from coal-fired power plants in the stratosphere, which presently are lowering Earth's temperature by 0.5 F, via the parasol-effect.
Once the remaining coal-fired power plants are turned off, Earth's average temperature will rise another half a degree with a month or so.