Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2019, 11:16 PM   #5941 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,925
Thanks: 3,754
Thanked 4,977 Times in 3,958 Posts
Moon power. It's everywhere. Or at least 70% of everywhere.

Scott Adams makes his 80-year prediction, but he starts with how his new car hugs him. It takes a while to get there.

https://youtu.be/pCX2Vo3Ydcc?t=2704

The episode title (Episode 553 Scott Adams: Why President Trump Will Win 2020 in HUGE Landslide) is an experiment. The last one was Episode 552 Scott Adams: The Trump Impeachment HOAX, Bitcoin. He's trying to see if the title affects the statistics.

__________________
.
The only reason that the chicken is not gone extinct is because they're so delicious that we breed them at a very high rate to ensure that we don't run out of Chris Ray Gun
_________________

Don't Californicate Oregon

_________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-04-2019, 02:57 PM   #5942 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,829

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,295
Thanked 2,845 Times in 1,788 Posts






__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 06-04-2019 at 04:35 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 12:23 PM   #5943 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,740
Thanks: 16,898
Thanked 5,745 Times in 3,459 Posts
real world

Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
"To power the world". I have shown you over and over again based on real world data, this is complete nonsense to keep putting these in front of people. It breeds complacency and ill will because then they think that we would have it made if we would only choose to put up some solar and wind and also the just puts the blame on "evil. rich. white, oil barons" for keeping us from a simple choice.
.
It is not so simple.
*I'm going to argue that,these depictions of primary power requirements are either intentionally, intellectually dishonest,or born out of ignorance, stupidity,or worse.
*And the reason I argue this has to do with the second law of thermodynamics,which is conveniently,and overtly ignored in the depicted data.
*Total US net energy requirements for 2014 were only on the order of 900-GW.
*Due to the thermal inefficiencies of coal,natural gas,and petroleum combustion,it took on the order of 3.176-TW worth of energy to produce the 900-GW.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
*If we freeze a snapshot of 2014 population and consumption,and consider our challenge regarding decarbonization,then we'd need only to consider building out 900-GW worth of capacity to handle the total power requirement for the nation.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Just the energy wasted on residential cooling and heating in 2014,would have financed 32.7-GW worth of installed wind power capacity,per year,had the National Building Code represented 'best-case' (off-the-shelf) practices.,essentially handing a $49-billion subsidy to electric power providers each year,in 2014 dollars.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
*It's absolutely amazing to me,that in a self-proclaimed,'capitalist' nation,that a large proportion of the adult population advocates,and defends torching the GDP.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2019, 01:51 PM   #5944 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 14,925
Thanks: 3,754
Thanked 4,977 Times in 3,958 Posts
Quote:
*Just the energy wasted on residential cooling and heating in 2014,would have financed 32.7-GW worth of installed wind power capacity,per year,had the National Building Code represented 'best-case' (off-the-shelf) practices.


Saving energy since 1980. If this had become the norm, where would we be today?
__________________
.
The only reason that the chicken is not gone extinct is because they're so delicious that we breed them at a very high rate to ensure that we don't run out of Chris Ray Gun
_________________

Don't Californicate Oregon

_________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 02:31 PM   #5945 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 900
Thanks: 192
Thanked 318 Times in 224 Posts
This problem of global warming is not a simple puzzle.

I do not doubt the earth is warming, I just doubt the simple correlation of CO2 and temperature is the only driving variable. If we cripple our economies to mitigate CO2 output and find the earth heats up anyways because we ignored the other variables, then where are we?

There are other corollaries such as industrial output and population growth and urban sprawl that follow current environmental heating. No one is proposing reduction of any of that to curb global warming.

And even though I am a firm supporter of nuclear power, I support as much renewable energy ( solar, wind ) as possible with the understanding that storage and distribution must be taken into account to make it feasible to power a modern society.

Here is a solution on a utility scale proposal that makes an attempt to more effectively harness the growing use of solar and wind production.

https://www.greencarcongress.com/201...0603-utah.html
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019), redpoint5 (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 02:56 PM   #5946 (permalink)
EV convert
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 8,186

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 124.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 186
Thanked 2,661 Times in 2,083 Posts
We will be in another ice age in 1000 to 2000 years.
Enjoy the warm weather while it lasts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut View Post
I do not doubt the earth is warming, I just doubt the simple correlation of CO2 and temperature is the only driving variable. If we cripple our economies to mitigate CO2 output and find the earth heats up anyways because we ignored the other variables, then where are we?
They either don't care or refuse to entertain that as a possibility.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 02:58 PM   #5947 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,740
Thanks: 16,898
Thanked 5,745 Times in 3,459 Posts
only driving variable

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut View Post
I do not doubt the earth is warming, I just doubt the simple correlation of CO2 and temperature is the only driving variable. If we cripple our economies to mitigate CO2 output and find the earth heats up anyways because we ignored the other variables, then where are we?

There are other corollaries such as industrial output and population growth and urban sprawl that follow current environmental heating. No one is proposing reduction of any of that to curb global warming.

And even though I am a firm supporter of nuclear power, I support as much renewable energy ( solar, wind ) as possible with the understanding that storage and distribution must be taken into account to make it feasible to power a modern society.

Here is a solution on a utility scale proposal that makes an attempt to more effectively harness the growing use of solar and wind production.

https://www.greencarcongress.com/201...0603-utah.html
Their statistical analysis isolated a trend line which falls outside that of natural variability,written in the proxy records.
The last time Earth saw over 400ppmv of carbon dioxide,the oceans were 75-100 feet higher than today.
*Water vapor is good for 50% of the warming
*Clouds are good for 20%.
*Anthropogenic greenhouse gases are the other 30%.
Without removing the extra GHGs,Earth will continue to warm,evaporation will increase,which will drive water vapor higher,in a self-amplifying feedback loop.It's happened before,it will happen again.
*The greatest threat is relative humidity (latent heat) and 'Real Feel' temperature.Mammals cannot survive beyond 35-degrees C heat index.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want an example of what awaits us,just look at Mercury and Venus.
Venus is basically twice as far from the Sun as Mercury,but twice as hot.The only reason is it's carbon dioxide atmosphere.As we continue to add carbon dioxide,Methane, and Nitrous oxide to the atmosphere,we become more and more like Venus (844-F,day and night)
Earth would be -100 F without the little bit of GHG that we have.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-06-2019), Vman455 (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 03:15 PM   #5948 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 900
Thanks: 192
Thanked 318 Times in 224 Posts
That's all good and fine.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Their statistical analysis isolated a trend line which falls outside that of natural variability,written in the proxy records.
The last time Earth saw over 400ppmv of carbon dioxide,the oceans were 75-100 feet higher than today.
*Water vapor is good for 50% of the warming
*Clouds are good for 20%.
*Anthropogenic greenhouse gases are the other 30%.
Without removing the extra GHGs,Earth will continue to warm,evaporation will increase,which will drive water vapor higher,in a self-amplifying feedback loop.It's happened before,it will happen again.
*The greatest threat is relative humidity (latent heat) and 'Real Feel' temperature.Mammals cannot survive beyond 35-degrees C heat index.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you want an example of what awaits us,just look at Mercury and Venus.
Venus is basically twice as far from the Sun as Mercury,but twice as hot.The only reason is it's carbon dioxide atmosphere.As we continue to add carbon dioxide,Methane, and Nitrous oxide to the atmosphere,we become more and more like Venus (844-F,day and night)
Earth would be -100 F without the little bit of GHG that we have.
But what if they have missed something and the heating continues even after the Western World has crippled their economies to reduce the drivers of greenhouse gasses? The seesaw is finely balanced and if something as simple as albedo or a combination of other un-forseen variables still tip us into a heating path, then where are we?

War and pestilence is easily the result of lesser stressors.

A headlong rush into a silver bullet solution (solar, wind ) can leave us wide open to a blind side wallop if we realize we forgot to read the signs more closely.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-05-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 03:16 PM   #5949 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,740
Thanks: 16,898
Thanked 5,745 Times in 3,459 Posts
ice age/care/refuse

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
We will be in another ice age in 1000 to 2000 years.
Enjoy the warm weather while it lasts.


They either don't care or refuse to entertain that as a possibility.
The shortest Milankovitch cycle is on a 23,000-year cycle.Interglacials average around 18,000-years,so we'd be early in 1,000-2000 years.We would have already seen some cooling if it weren't for the greenhouse gases.We may be able to overcome the astronomical forcing which drove past glaciations.The Solar irradiance plays only a minor role compared to greenhouse effect.The Sun's been dimming since 1960,while the planets been warming to record levels.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As to the economy,we're just recently finding out what it actually is.And the 'new' data says basically that,short of 100% carbon-capture and sequestration,plus removing all the carbon we've put in the atmosphere,we've got to get away from fossil-fuel combustion just as fast as we can,and damn the economy!
If your economic facts were 'real' it would be one thing,but they're not.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (06-06-2019)
Old 06-05-2019, 04:25 PM   #5950 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,740
Thanks: 16,898
Thanked 5,745 Times in 3,459 Posts
missed,economy,simple ....................

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut View Post
But what if they have missed something and the heating continues even after the Western World has crippled their economies to reduce the drivers of greenhouse gasses? The seesaw is finely balanced and if something as simple as albedo or a combination of other un-forseen variables still tip us into a heating path, then where are we?

War and pestilence is easily the result of lesser stressors.

A headlong rush into a silver bullet solution (solar, wind ) can leave us wide open to a blind side wallop if we realize we forgot to read the signs more closely.
The greenhouse effect has been known for over a hundred years.There's been a lot of brain-storming since back then.There's probably little that has not come under discussion and consideration.By 1998,the general circulation models began to match observations,plus be able to recreate past anomalies,which is the only reason scientists have any confidence at all in them.
Capitalists have a track record of crippling the economy all by themselves,without climate change or anything else.We've had plenty of 'crisis',crashes,burst bubbles,meltdowns.It's what they do.Some presidential appointees have made sure they happened,even when warned by their listening posts.That absolutely was the case in 2008.
There's no reason for the economy to get hurt.We'll just be buying refrigerators instead of ice boxes.LEDs instead of whale oil lamps.
There will be a redistribution of wealth into emerging technologies,while eclipsed technology like livery stables and buggy whip makers disappear.
If we ceased GHG emissions,and removed CO2 down to pre-industrial levels,there wouldn't be any known mechanism to drive global warming the way it's going now.
We're already seeing civil war as a consequence of food supply collapse,as with Russia (drought) in 2010,and Arab Spring.The Pentagon is very concerned about this sort of thing.
I wish there was a silver bullet.All we have at our disposal is,a 30-year transition off fossil-fuel combustion,onto a market basket of renewable energy sources,continued improvements in efficiency, and storage.It's where the future billionaires and jobs will come from.
There won't be any rush about it,just slow,steady,incremental change.Just the way capitalists like it.
The signs all say something like 'Green New Deal'.
And a careful reading of the Preamble to, the United States Constitution says likewise.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-05-2019), NeilBlanchard (06-06-2019)
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
lies, opinion, reality, scam

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com